Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
given
|
|
|
|
It's already too small
|
|
See 636eb6116961296791bae35c40fd9438aa946827
|
|
|
|
beam)
|
|
|
|
This seems to be a major cause of "going off the rails", and the
surfaces look reasonable (in fact, better) without it. Plus, if the
user says --no-scale, there should be no scaling at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
radius
|
|
|
|
limit for pgraph
Rationale for pgraph: the viewer already has a resolution selector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Handling strings in HDF5 is already a complete pain. Eventually we
should handle an array of strings, but it's too hard for now.
|
|
3 might be too low for a hypothetical file format with, say, two
wildcard dimensions.
|
|
Already handled by return codes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
... and replace hdfile_get_value() with it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simply omit the -g option to use geometry from stream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
About the comment: yes, it is. temp2 (T) has already been de-logged by
this point.
|
|
|
|
Since we are now using residual() in a numerical minimisation, it's
important that it uses either only free-flagged reflections, or only
non-free-flagged ones.
|