aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>2008-02-12 14:56:25 -0800
committerMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>2008-03-10 15:13:54 -0700
commit0f71b7b40f55de909e40fa5ab217a5da3439c7d8 (patch)
tree3afad178b200b0a16e10ccaca2b05da1197034d4
parent2af37ce82d199d1d8cd6286f42f37d321627a807 (diff)
ocfs2: Fix endian bug in o2dlm protocol negotiation.
struct dlm_query_join_packet is made up of four one-byte fields. They are effectively in big-endian order already. However, little-endian machines swap them before putting the packet on the wire (because query_join's response is a status, and that status is treated as a u32 on the wire). Thus, a big-endian and little-endian machines will treat this structure differently. The solution is to have little-endian machines swap the structure when converting from the structure to the u32 representation. Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
-rw-r--r--fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h20
-rw-r--r--fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c101
2 files changed, 76 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h
index 9843ee17ea2..1f939631ab7 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h
@@ -602,17 +602,19 @@ enum dlm_query_join_response_code {
JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH,
};
+struct dlm_query_join_packet {
+ u8 code; /* Response code. dlm_minor and fs_minor
+ are only valid if this is JOIN_OK */
+ u8 dlm_minor; /* The minor version of the protocol the
+ dlm is speaking. */
+ u8 fs_minor; /* The minor version of the protocol the
+ filesystem is speaking. */
+ u8 reserved;
+};
+
union dlm_query_join_response {
u32 intval;
- struct {
- u8 code; /* Response code. dlm_minor and fs_minor
- are only valid if this is JOIN_OK */
- u8 dlm_minor; /* The minor version of the protocol the
- dlm is speaking. */
- u8 fs_minor; /* The minor version of the protocol the
- filesystem is speaking. */
- u8 reserved;
- } packet;
+ struct dlm_query_join_packet packet;
};
struct dlm_lock_request
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c
index 906974cfbf1..0879d86113e 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c
@@ -713,14 +713,46 @@ static int dlm_query_join_proto_check(char *proto_type, int node,
return rc;
}
+/*
+ * struct dlm_query_join_packet is made up of four one-byte fields. They
+ * are effectively in big-endian order already. However, little-endian
+ * machines swap them before putting the packet on the wire (because
+ * query_join's response is a status, and that status is treated as a u32
+ * on the wire). Thus, a big-endian and little-endian machines will treat
+ * this structure differently.
+ *
+ * The solution is to have little-endian machines swap the structure when
+ * converting from the structure to the u32 representation. This will
+ * result in the structure having the correct format on the wire no matter
+ * the host endian format.
+ */
+static void dlm_query_join_packet_to_wire(struct dlm_query_join_packet *packet,
+ u32 *wire)
+{
+ union dlm_query_join_response response;
+
+ response.packet = *packet;
+ *wire = cpu_to_be32(response.intval);
+}
+
+static void dlm_query_join_wire_to_packet(u32 wire,
+ struct dlm_query_join_packet *packet)
+{
+ union dlm_query_join_response response;
+
+ response.intval = cpu_to_be32(wire);
+ *packet = response.packet;
+}
+
static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
void **ret_data)
{
struct dlm_query_join_request *query;
- union dlm_query_join_response response = {
- .packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW,
+ struct dlm_query_join_packet packet = {
+ .code = JOIN_DISALLOW,
};
struct dlm_ctxt *dlm = NULL;
+ u32 response;
u8 nodenum;
query = (struct dlm_query_join_request *) msg->buf;
@@ -737,11 +769,11 @@ static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
mlog(0, "node %u is not in our live map yet\n",
query->node_idx);
- response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
+ packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
goto respond;
}
- response.packet.code = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP;
+ packet.code = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP;
spin_lock(&dlm_domain_lock);
dlm = __dlm_lookup_domain_full(query->domain, query->name_len);
@@ -760,7 +792,7 @@ static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
mlog(0, "disallow join as node %u does not "
"have node %u in its nodemap\n",
query->node_idx, nodenum);
- response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
+ packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
goto unlock_respond;
}
}
@@ -780,23 +812,23 @@ static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
/*If this is a brand new context and we
* haven't started our join process yet, then
* the other node won the race. */
- response.packet.code = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP;
+ packet.code = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP;
} else if (dlm->joining_node != DLM_LOCK_RES_OWNER_UNKNOWN) {
/* Disallow parallel joins. */
- response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
+ packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
} else if (dlm->reco.state & DLM_RECO_STATE_ACTIVE) {
mlog(0, "node %u trying to join, but recovery "
"is ongoing.\n", bit);
- response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
+ packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
} else if (test_bit(bit, dlm->recovery_map)) {
mlog(0, "node %u trying to join, but it "
"still needs recovery.\n", bit);
- response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
+ packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
} else if (test_bit(bit, dlm->domain_map)) {
mlog(0, "node %u trying to join, but it "
"is still in the domain! needs recovery?\n",
bit);
- response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
+ packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
} else {
/* Alright we're fully a part of this domain
* so we keep some state as to who's joining
@@ -807,19 +839,15 @@ static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
if (dlm_query_join_proto_check("DLM", bit,
&dlm->dlm_locking_proto,
&query->dlm_proto)) {
- response.packet.code =
- JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH;
+ packet.code = JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH;
} else if (dlm_query_join_proto_check("fs", bit,
&dlm->fs_locking_proto,
&query->fs_proto)) {
- response.packet.code =
- JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH;
+ packet.code = JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH;
} else {
- response.packet.dlm_minor =
- query->dlm_proto.pv_minor;
- response.packet.fs_minor =
- query->fs_proto.pv_minor;
- response.packet.code = JOIN_OK;
+ packet.dlm_minor = query->dlm_proto.pv_minor;
+ packet.fs_minor = query->fs_proto.pv_minor;
+ packet.code = JOIN_OK;
__dlm_set_joining_node(dlm, query->node_idx);
}
}
@@ -830,9 +858,10 @@ unlock_respond:
spin_unlock(&dlm_domain_lock);
respond:
- mlog(0, "We respond with %u\n", response.packet.code);
+ mlog(0, "We respond with %u\n", packet.code);
- return response.intval;
+ dlm_query_join_packet_to_wire(&packet, &response);
+ return response;
}
static int dlm_assert_joined_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
@@ -968,7 +997,8 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
{
int status;
struct dlm_query_join_request join_msg;
- union dlm_query_join_response join_resp;
+ struct dlm_query_join_packet packet;
+ u32 join_resp;
mlog(0, "querying node %d\n", node);
@@ -984,11 +1014,12 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
status = o2net_send_message(DLM_QUERY_JOIN_MSG, DLM_MOD_KEY, &join_msg,
sizeof(join_msg), node,
- &join_resp.intval);
+ &join_resp);
if (status < 0 && status != -ENOPROTOOPT) {
mlog_errno(status);
goto bail;
}
+ dlm_query_join_wire_to_packet(join_resp, &packet);
/* -ENOPROTOOPT from the net code means the other side isn't
listening for our message type -- that's fine, it means
@@ -997,10 +1028,10 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
if (status == -ENOPROTOOPT) {
status = 0;
*response = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP;
- } else if (join_resp.packet.code == JOIN_DISALLOW ||
- join_resp.packet.code == JOIN_OK_NO_MAP) {
- *response = join_resp.packet.code;
- } else if (join_resp.packet.code == JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH) {
+ } else if (packet.code == JOIN_DISALLOW ||
+ packet.code == JOIN_OK_NO_MAP) {
+ *response = packet.code;
+ } else if (packet.code == JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH) {
mlog(ML_NOTICE,
"This node requested DLM locking protocol %u.%u and "
"filesystem locking protocol %u.%u. At least one of "
@@ -1012,14 +1043,12 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor,
node);
status = -EPROTO;
- *response = join_resp.packet.code;
- } else if (join_resp.packet.code == JOIN_OK) {
- *response = join_resp.packet.code;
+ *response = packet.code;
+ } else if (packet.code == JOIN_OK) {
+ *response = packet.code;
/* Use the same locking protocol as the remote node */
- dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor =
- join_resp.packet.dlm_minor;
- dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor =
- join_resp.packet.fs_minor;
+ dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor = packet.dlm_minor;
+ dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor = packet.fs_minor;
mlog(0,
"Node %d responds JOIN_OK with DLM locking protocol "
"%u.%u and fs locking protocol %u.%u\n",
@@ -1031,11 +1060,11 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
} else {
status = -EINVAL;
mlog(ML_ERROR, "invalid response %d from node %u\n",
- join_resp.packet.code, node);
+ packet.code, node);
}
mlog(0, "status %d, node %d response is %d\n", status, node,
- *response);
+ *response);
bail:
return status;