aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>2009-10-27 10:55:05 -0700
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>2009-12-11 11:55:18 -0800
commitdccd574cccad950d9ed9bc192eae4089c6044d9d (patch)
treecd4a5c599c5a50c84dee8074e25e939dae71a276
parentd7e055f1975cac560427c924d2bff4b5d41fe442 (diff)
USB: ehci: Respect IST when scheduling new split iTDs.
The EHCI specification says that an EHCI host controller may cache part of the isochronous schedule. The EHCI controller must advertise how much it caches in the schedule through the HCCPARAMS register isochronous scheduling threshold (IST) bits. In theory, adding new iTDs within the IST should be harmless. The HW will follow the old cached linked list and miss the new iTD. SW will notice HW missed the iTD and return 0 for the transfer length. However, Intel ICH9 chipsets (and some later chipsets) have issues when SW attempts to schedule a split transaction within the IST. All transfers will cease being sent out that port, and the drivers will see isochronous packets complete with a length of zero. Start of frames may or may not also disappear, causing the device to go into auto-suspend. This "bus stall" will continue until a control or bulk transfer is queued to a device under that roothub. Most drivers will never cause this behavior, because they use multiple URBs with multiple packets to keep the bus busy. If you limit the number of URBs to one, you may be able to hit this bug. Make sure the EHCI driver does not schedule full-speed transfers within the IST under an Intel chipset. Make sure that when we fall behind the current microframe plus IST, we schedule the new transfer at the next periodic interval after the IST. Don't change the scheduling for new transfers, since the schedule slop will always be greater than the IST. Allow high speed isochronous transfers to be scheduled within the IST, since this doesn't trigger the Intel chipset bug. Make sure that if the host caches the full frame, the EHCI driver's internal isochronous threshold (ehci->i_thresh) is set to 8 microframes + 2 microframes wiggle room. This is similar to what is done in the case where the host caches less than the full frame. Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-rw-r--r--drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c2
-rw-r--r--drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c30
2 files changed, 21 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
index 4ed2c931dae..546ad881400 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ static int ehci_init(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
/* controllers may cache some of the periodic schedule ... */
hcc_params = ehci_readl(ehci, &ehci->caps->hcc_params);
if (HCC_ISOC_CACHE(hcc_params)) // full frame cache
- ehci->i_thresh = 8;
+ ehci->i_thresh = 2 + 8;
else // N microframes cached
ehci->i_thresh = 2 + HCC_ISOC_THRES(hcc_params);
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c
index 84079ebbe65..1e391e624c8 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c
@@ -1394,10 +1394,11 @@ iso_stream_schedule (
struct ehci_iso_stream *stream
)
{
- u32 now, start, max, period;
+ u32 now, next, start, period;
int status;
unsigned mod = ehci->periodic_size << 3;
struct ehci_iso_sched *sched = urb->hcpriv;
+ struct pci_dev *pdev;
if (sched->span > (mod - SCHEDULE_SLOP)) {
ehci_dbg (ehci, "iso request %p too long\n", urb);
@@ -1418,26 +1419,35 @@ iso_stream_schedule (
now = ehci_readl(ehci, &ehci->regs->frame_index) % mod;
- /* when's the last uframe this urb could start? */
- max = now + mod;
-
/* Typical case: reuse current schedule, stream is still active.
* Hopefully there are no gaps from the host falling behind
* (irq delays etc), but if there are we'll take the next
* slot in the schedule, implicitly assuming URB_ISO_ASAP.
*/
if (likely (!list_empty (&stream->td_list))) {
+ pdev = to_pci_dev(ehci_to_hcd(ehci)->self.controller);
start = stream->next_uframe;
- if (start < now)
- start += mod;
+
+ /* For high speed devices, allow scheduling within the
+ * isochronous scheduling threshold. For full speed devices,
+ * don't. (Work around for Intel ICH9 bug.)
+ */
+ if (!stream->highspeed &&
+ pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL)
+ next = now + ehci->i_thresh;
+ else
+ next = now;
/* Fell behind (by up to twice the slop amount)? */
- if (start >= max - 2 * SCHEDULE_SLOP)
+ if (((start - next) & (mod - 1)) >=
+ mod - 2 * SCHEDULE_SLOP)
start += period * DIV_ROUND_UP(
- max - start, period) - mod;
+ (next - start) & (mod - 1),
+ period);
/* Tried to schedule too far into the future? */
- if (unlikely((start + sched->span) >= max)) {
+ if (unlikely(((start - now) & (mod - 1)) + sched->span
+ >= mod - 2 * SCHEDULE_SLOP)) {
status = -EFBIG;
goto fail;
}
@@ -1482,7 +1492,7 @@ iso_stream_schedule (
/* no room in the schedule */
ehci_dbg (ehci, "iso %ssched full %p (now %d max %d)\n",
list_empty (&stream->td_list) ? "" : "re",
- urb, now, max);
+ urb, now, now + mod);
status = -ENOSPC;
fail: