Merge commit 'v2.6.26-rc8' into x86/xen

Conflicts:

	arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
	arch/x86/xen/mmu.c

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
index 60391e9a84d..28092bc5014 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
@@ -1322,6 +1322,9 @@ static int mv_port_start(struct ata_port *ap)
 		goto out_port_free_dma_mem;
 	memset(pp->crpb, 0, MV_CRPB_Q_SZ);
 
+	/* 6041/6081 Rev. "C0" (and newer) are okay with async notify */
+	if (hpriv->hp_flags & MV_HP_ERRATA_60X1C0)
+		ap->flags |= ATA_FLAG_AN;
 	/*
 	 * For GEN_I, there's no NCQ, so we only allocate a single sg_tbl.
 	 * For later hardware, we need one unique sg_tbl per NCQ tag.
@@ -1592,6 +1595,24 @@ static unsigned int mv_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
 
 	if ((qc->tf.protocol != ATA_PROT_DMA) &&
 	    (qc->tf.protocol != ATA_PROT_NCQ)) {
+		static int limit_warnings = 10;
+		/*
+		 * Errata SATA#16, SATA#24: warn if multiple DRQs expected.
+		 *
+		 * Someday, we might implement special polling workarounds
+		 * for these, but it all seems rather unnecessary since we
+		 * normally use only DMA for commands which transfer more
+		 * than a single block of data.
+		 *
+		 * Much of the time, this could just work regardless.
+		 * So for now, just log the incident, and allow the attempt.
+		 */
+		if (limit_warnings && (qc->nbytes / qc->sect_size) > 1) {
+			--limit_warnings;
+			ata_link_printk(qc->dev->link, KERN_WARNING, DRV_NAME
+					": attempting PIO w/multiple DRQ: "
+					"this may fail due to h/w errata\n");
+		}
 		/*
 		 * We're about to send a non-EDMA capable command to the
 		 * port.  Turn off EDMA so there won't be problems accessing