aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2009-03-28 04:21:18 +0100
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2009-03-28 04:26:01 +0100
commit82268da1b130f763d22d04f7d016bbf6fc8815c2 (patch)
tree9803f361556d10708313e980428e63a18162e667 /drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c
parent6e15cf04860074ad032e88c306bea656bbdd0f22 (diff)
parent5d80f8e5a9dc9c9a94d4aeaa567e219a808b8a4a (diff)
Merge branch 'linus' into percpu-cpumask-x86-for-linus-2
Conflicts: arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c drivers/gpu/drm/drm_proc.c Manual merge to resolve build warning due to phys_addr_t type change on x86: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_info.c Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c13
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c
index f65c308a671..af6b9d44477 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static struct iwl3945_tpt_entry iwl3945_tpt_table_g[] = {
#define IWL39_RATE_HIGH_TH 11520
#define IWL_SUCCESS_UP_TH 8960
#define IWL_SUCCESS_DOWN_TH 10880
-#define IWL_RATE_MIN_FAILURE_TH 8
+#define IWL_RATE_MIN_FAILURE_TH 6
#define IWL_RATE_MIN_SUCCESS_TH 8
#define IWL_RATE_DECREASE_TH 1920
#define IWL_RATE_RETRY_TH 15
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static void rs_tx_status(void *priv_rate, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband
IWL_DEBUG_RATE(priv, "enter\n");
- retries = info->status.rates[0].count - 1;
+ retries = info->status.rates[0].count;
/* Sanity Check for retries */
if (retries > IWL_RATE_RETRY_TH)
retries = IWL_RATE_RETRY_TH;
@@ -791,16 +791,15 @@ static void rs_get_rate(void *priv_r, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
if ((window->success_ratio < IWL_RATE_DECREASE_TH) || !current_tpt) {
IWL_DEBUG_RATE(priv, "decrease rate because of low success_ratio\n");
scale_action = -1;
-
/* No throughput measured yet for adjacent rates,
* try increase */
} else if ((low_tpt == IWL_INVALID_VALUE) &&
(high_tpt == IWL_INVALID_VALUE)) {
- if (high != IWL_RATE_INVALID && window->success_counter >= IWL_RATE_INCREASE_TH)
+ if (high != IWL_RATE_INVALID && window->success_ratio >= IWL_RATE_INCREASE_TH)
scale_action = 1;
else if (low != IWL_RATE_INVALID)
- scale_action = -1;
+ scale_action = 0;
/* Both adjacent throughputs are measured, but neither one has
* better throughput; we're using the best rate, don't change
@@ -826,14 +825,14 @@ static void rs_get_rate(void *priv_r, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
else {
IWL_DEBUG_RATE(priv,
"decrease rate because of high tpt\n");
- scale_action = -1;
+ scale_action = 0;
}
} else if (low_tpt != IWL_INVALID_VALUE) {
if (low_tpt > current_tpt) {
IWL_DEBUG_RATE(priv,
"decrease rate because of low tpt\n");
scale_action = -1;
- } else if (window->success_counter >= IWL_RATE_INCREASE_TH) {
+ } else if (window->success_ratio >= IWL_RATE_INCREASE_TH) {
/* Lower rate has better
* throughput,decrease rate */
scale_action = 1;