aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/asm-m68k/dvma.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>2006-06-21 15:18:34 -0700
committerDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>2006-06-21 18:30:26 -0400
commit4ec223d02f4d5f5a3129edc0e3d22550d6ac8a32 (patch)
tree753cec643fa59ccda64a95fa5436956e481c1137 /include/asm-m68k/dvma.h
parent9ed059e1551bf36092215b965838502ac21f42e4 (diff)
[CPUFREQ] Fix ondemand vs suspend deadlock
Rootcaused the bug to a deadlock in cpufreq and ondemand. Due to non-existent ordering between cpu_hotplug lock and dbs_mutex. Basically a race condition between cpu_down() and do_dbs_timer(). cpu_down() flow: * cpu_down() call for CPU 1 * Takes hot plug lock * Calls pre down notifier * cpufreq notifier handler calls cpufreq_driver_target() which takes cpu_hotplug lock again. OK as cpu_hotplug lock is recursive in same process context * CPU 1 goes down * Calls post down notifier * cpufreq notifier handler calls ondemand event stop which takes dbs_mutex So, cpu_hotplug lock is taken before dbs_mutex in this flow. do_dbs_timer is triggerred by a periodic timer event. It first takes dbs_mutex and then takes cpu_hotplug lock in cpufreq_driver_target(). Note the reverse order here compared to above. So, if this timer event happens at right moment during cpu_down, system will deadlok. Attached patch fixes the issue for both ondemand and conservative. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/asm-m68k/dvma.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions