diff options
author | Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> | 2007-10-16 01:25:27 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org> | 2007-10-16 09:42:58 -0700 |
commit | 13808910713a98cc1159291e62cdfec92cc94d05 (patch) | |
tree | 0fd7189dc2a76e1ae165ca5d6e8c6b4e6f1761af /mm | |
parent | 55144768e100b68447f44c5e5c9deb155ad661bd (diff) |
Memoryless nodes: Generic management of nodemasks for various purposes
Why do we need to support memoryless nodes?
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> For fujitsu, problem is called "empty" node.
>
> When ACPI's SRAT table includes "possible nodes", ia64 bootstrap(acpi_numa_init)
> creates nodes, which includes no memory, no cpu.
>
> I tried to remove empty-node in past, but that was denied.
> It was because we can hot-add cpu to the empty node.
> (node-hotplug triggered by cpu is not implemented now. and it will be ugly.)
>
>
> For HP, (Lee can comment on this later), they have memory-less-node.
> As far as I hear, HP's machine can have following configration.
>
> (example)
> Node0: CPU0 memory AAA MB
> Node1: CPU1 memory AAA MB
> Node2: CPU2 memory AAA MB
> Node3: CPU3 memory AAA MB
> Node4: Memory XXX GB
>
> AAA is very small value (below 16MB) and will be omitted by ia64 bootstrap.
> After boot, only Node 4 has valid memory (but have no cpu.)
>
> Maybe this is memory-interleave by firmware config.
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> Future SGI platforms (actually also current one can have but nothing like
> that is deployed to my knowledge) have nodes with only cpus. Current SGI
> platforms have nodes with just I/O that we so far cannot manage in the
> core. So the arch code maps them to the nearest memory node.
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com> wrote:
> For the HP platforms, we can configure each cell with from 0% to 100%
> "cell local memory". When we configure with <100% CLM, the "missing
> percentages" are interleaved by hardware on a cache-line granularity to
> improve bandwidth at the expense of latency for numa-challenged
> applications [and OSes, but not our problem ;-)]. When we boot Linux on
> such a config, all of the real nodes have no memory--it all resides in a
> single interleaved pseudo-node.
>
> When we boot Linux on a 100% CLM configuration [== NUMA], we still have
> the interleaved pseudo-node. It contains a few hundred MB stolen from
> the real nodes to contain the DMA zone. [Interleaved memory resides at
> phys addr 0]. The memoryless-nodes patches, along with the zoneorder
> patches, support this config as well.
>
> Also, when we boot a NUMA config with the "mem=" command line,
> specifying less memory than actually exists, Linux takes the excluded
> memory "off the top" rather than distributing it across the nodes. This
> can result in memoryless nodes, as well.
>
This patch:
Preparation for memoryless node patches.
Provide a generic way to keep nodemasks describing various characteristics of
NUMA nodes.
Remove the node_online_map and the node_possible map and realize the same
functionality using two nodes stats: N_POSSIBLE and N_ONLINE.
[Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com: Initialize N_*_MEMORY and N_CPU masks for non-NUMA config]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Tested-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Acked-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Acked-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@hp.com>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/page_alloc.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 71013e6bef2..0cc5b3e198e 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -47,13 +47,21 @@ #include "internal.h" /* - * MCD - HACK: Find somewhere to initialize this EARLY, or make this - * initializer cleaner + * Array of node states. */ -nodemask_t node_online_map __read_mostly = { { [0] = 1UL } }; -EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_online_map); -nodemask_t node_possible_map __read_mostly = NODE_MASK_ALL; -EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_possible_map); +nodemask_t node_states[NR_NODE_STATES] __read_mostly = { + [N_POSSIBLE] = NODE_MASK_ALL, + [N_ONLINE] = { { [0] = 1UL } }, +#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA + [N_NORMAL_MEMORY] = { { [0] = 1UL } }, +#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM + [N_HIGH_MEMORY] = { { [0] = 1UL } }, +#endif + [N_CPU] = { { [0] = 1UL } }, +#endif /* NUMA */ +}; +EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_states); + unsigned long totalram_pages __read_mostly; unsigned long totalreserve_pages __read_mostly; long nr_swap_pages; |