aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/bridge
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>2010-03-13 12:26:15 -0800
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2010-03-13 12:26:15 -0800
commitc251c7f738cd94eb3a1febda318078c661eccb4d (patch)
tree289938bee0931996df4c195f5ea459444bfcf5e6 /net/bridge
parent2a40018984c5c9647df1c18489449a3a227d9136 (diff)
drivers/net/tulip/eeprom.c: fix bogus "(null)" in tulip init messages
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 08:41 -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> > Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:33:28 +0100 > > Booting 2.6.34-rc1 on a machine with a tulip nic I see > > a number of kernel messages that include "(null)" where > > previous kernels included the string "tulip0": > CC:'ing the guilty party :-) It's one of the following > commits: Thanks Mikael. Anonymity has some good attributes. Blame avoidance is one of them. I've broad shoulders. It's me, then Dwight Howard... There might be another few of these where ->name or ->dev was used before struct device or net_device was registered. I'll go back and check. tulip_core has: if (tp->flags & HAS_MEDIA_TABLE) { sprintf(dev->name, DRV_NAME "%d", board_idx); /* hack */ tulip_parse_eeprom(dev); strcpy(dev->name, "eth%d"); /* un-hack */ } So I don't feel _too_ bad. tulip_parse_eeprom is done before register_netdev so the logging there can not use netdev_<level> or dev_<level>(&dev->dev Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Tested-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bridge')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions