aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2006-03-26[PATCH] sem2mutex: misc static one-file mutexesIngo Molnar
Semaphore to mutex conversion. The conversion was generated via scripts, and the result was validated automatically via a script as well. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> Acked-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Cc: Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-05[X86] Remove pointless versioning of mtrr driver.Dave Jones
It's not like this has changed significantly, and probably never will. Reduce some bootup dmesg noise. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-12-20[X86] Rename MTRR mutex to something more sensible.Dave Jones
I spotted 'main_lock' whilst grovelling through a vmlinux with objdump. Even if it is static, it's a horrible name. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-11-14[PATCH] x86_64: Force correct address space size for MTRR on some 64bit ↵Shaohua Li
Intel Xeons They report 40bit, but only have 36bits of physical address space. This caused problems with setting up the correct masks for MTRR. CPUID workaround for steppings 0F33h(supporting x86) and 0F34h(supporting x86 and EM64T). Detail info can be found at: http://download.intel.com/design/Xeon/specupdt/30240216.pdf http://download.intel.com/design/Pentium4/specupdt/30235221.pdf Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li<shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-05[PATCH] swsusp: fix remaining u32 vs. pm_message_t confusionPavel Machek
Fix remaining bits of u32 vs. pm_message confusion. Should not break anything. Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-07[PATCH] MTRR suspend/resume cleanupShaohua Li
There has been some discuss about solving the SMP MTRR suspend/resume breakage, but I didn't find a patch for it. This is an intent for it. The basic idea is moving mtrr initializing into cpu_identify for all APs (so it works for cpu hotplug). For BP, restore_processor_state is responsible for restoring MTRR. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-23[PATCH] mtrr size-and-base debuggingAndrew Morton
Consolidate the mtrr sanity checking, add a dump_stack(). Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-01[PATCH] Enable write combining for server works LE rev > 6Lee Revell
Enable write combining for server works LE rev > 6 per http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0104.3/1007.html Signed-Off-By: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-04-16[PATCH] x86_64: Always use CPUID 80000008 to figure out MTRR address space sizeAndi Kleen
It doesn't make sense to only do this only for AMD K8. This would support future CPUs with extended address spaces properly. For i386 and x86-64 Cc: <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!