Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Reformat to fit in 80 columns. Fix a couple typos. Remove
a couple unused labels.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
|
|
Linux maps PAL instructions with an ITR, but uses a DTC for PAL data.
Section 11.10.2.1.3, "Making PAL Procedures Calls in Physical or Virtual
Mode," of the SDM (rev 2.2), says we must therefore make all PAL calls
with PSR.ic = 1 so that Linux can handle any TLB faults.
PAL_CALL_IC_OFF is currently unused, and as long as we use the ITR + DTC
strategy, we can't use it. So remove it. I also removed the code in
ia64_pal_call_static() that conditionally cleared PSR.ic.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
|
|
We found an issue in pal.S.
According to the software runtime SPEC,
The caller's output registers do not need to be preserved for
caller. The callee may reuse input registers for any other
purpose within the procedure.
in ia64_pal_call_phys_stacked,
input registers are copied to output registers before call
into ia64_switch_mode_phys, then used to call into PAL. This
assumes output registers are preserved in ia64_switch_mode_phys,
which may not be true.
In this particular case, ia64_switch_mode_phys alloc a null frame
, and mask off psr.i.
If an interrupt comes at this small window,
or an MCA comes inside the procedure, output registers
maybe changed,
then the pal call may got some staled input registers.
This patch moves the copies from input to output
after ia64_switch_mode_phys to follow the software
runtime convention.
It also removed some unused labels in
ia64_pal_call_phys_stacked.
Signed-off-by: Zou Nan hai <nanhai.zou@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|