Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The UARTs on the MPC824x are unique devices and really shouldn't be thought
of as a DUART. In addition, if both UARTs are in use we need to configure
the part to enable the 2nd UART since the pins for the UARTs are
multiplexed. Adds support to run the 824x Sandpoint with both UARTs if
desired.
Signed-off-by: Matt McClintock <msm@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
Added platform device initialization for the two 8250 style UARTs that
exist on the MPC8245. Additionally, updated the Sandpoint code to enable
one of these UARTs if an MPC8245 is connected to it.
Signed-off-by: Matt McClintock <msm@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
Converted the MPC10x bridge support (used by MPC10x and 8240/1/5) to used
the standard platform device model.
Signed-off-by: Matt McClintock <msm@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|