aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/ppc64/kernel/irq.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2005-06-30Merge rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/ppc64-2.6Linus Torvalds
2005-06-30[PATCH] ppc64: Don't count number of events processed for callerMichael Ellerman
Currently we count the number of lpevents processed in 3 seperate places. One of these counters is never read, so just remove it. This means hvlpevent_queue_process() no longer needs to return the number of events processed. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-06-30[PATCH] ppc64: Rename ItLpQueue_* functions to hvlpevent_queue_*Michael Ellerman
Now that we've renamed the xItLpQueue structure, rename the functions that operate on it also. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-06-30[PATCH] ppc64: Don't pass the pointers to xItLpQueue aroundMichael Ellerman
Because there's only one ItLpQueue and we know where it is, ie. xItLpQueue, there's no point passing pointers to it it around all over the place. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-06-30[PATCH] ppc64: Remove lpqueue pointer from the paca on iSeriesMichael Ellerman
The iSeries code keeps a pointer to the ItLpQueue in its paca struct. But all these pointers end up pointing to the one place, ie. xItLpQueue. So remove the pointer from the paca struct and just refer to xItLpQueue directly where needed. The only complication is that the spread_lpevents logic was implemented by having a NULL lpqueue pointer in the paca on CPUs that weren't supposed to process events. Instead we just compare the spread_lpevents value to the processor id to get the same behaviour. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-06-28[PATCH] irqpollAlan Cox
Anyone reporting a stuck IRQ should try these options. Its effectiveness varies we've found in the Fedora case. Quite a few systems with misdescribed IRQ routing just work when you use irqpoll. It also fixes up the VIA systems although thats now fixed with the VIA quirk (which we could just make default as its what Redmond OS does but Linus didn't like it historically). A small number of systems have jammed IRQ sources or misdescribes that cause an IRQ that we have no handler registered anywhere for. In those cases it doesn't help. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <number6@the-village.bc.nu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-23[PATCH] ppc64: add BPA platform typeArnd Bergmann
This adds the basic support for running on BPA machines. So far, this is only the IBM workstation, and it will not run on others without a little more generalization. It should be possible to configure a kernel for any combination of CONFIG_PPC_BPA with any of the other multiplatform targets. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arndb@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-06-21[PATCH] ppc64 iSeries: remove LparData.hStephen Rothwell
include/asm-ppc64/iSeries/LparData.h just included a whole lot of other files to declare variables that would be better declared in those other files. So, remove it. This will reduce that number of things needed to be included in most cases to access the relevant variables. Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!