aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2009-06-10KVM: s390: optimize float int lock: spin_lock_bh --> spin_lockChristian Borntraeger
The floating interrupt lock is only taken in process context. We can replace all spin_lock_bh with standard spin_lock calls. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-03-24KVM: s390: Fix problem state check for b2 interceptsChristian Borntraeger
The kernel handles some priviledged instruction exits. While I was unable to trigger such an exit from guest userspace, the code should check for supervisor state before emulating a priviledged instruction. I also renamed kvm_s390_handle_priv to kvm_s390_handle_b2. After all there are non priviledged b2 instructions like stck (store clock). Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-09[S390] Use unsigned long long for u64 on 64bit.Heiko Carstens
As requested by Andrew. Same as what sparc did. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2008-10-15KVM: s390: Make facility bits future-proofChristian Borntraeger
Heiko Carstens pointed out, that its safer to activate working facilities instead of disabling problematic facilities. The new code uses the host facility bits and masks it with known good ones. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
2008-07-31KVM: s390: Fix kvm on IBM System z10Christian Borntraeger
The z10 system supports large pages, kvm-s390 doesnt. Make sure that we dont advertise large pages to avoid the guest crashing as soon as the guest kernel activates DAT. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
2008-07-20KVM: s390: rename private structuresChristian Borntraeger
While doing some tests with our lcrash implementation I have seen a naming conflict with prefix_info in kvm_host.h vs. addrconf.h To avoid future conflicts lets rename private definitions in asm/kvm_host.h by adding the kvm_s390 prefix. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
2008-04-30[S390] Move stfl to system.h and delete duplicated version.Heiko Carstens
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2008-04-27KVM: s390: rename stfl to kvm_stflHeiko Carstens
Temporarily rename this function to avoid merge conflicts and/or dependencies. This function will be removed as soon as git-s390 and kvm.git are finally upstream. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
2008-04-27KVM: s390: intercepts for privileged instructionsChristian Borntraeger
This patch introduces in-kernel handling of some intercepts for privileged instructions: handle_set_prefix() sets the prefix register of the local cpu handle_store_prefix() stores the content of the prefix register to memory handle_store_cpu_address() stores the cpu number of the current cpu to memory handle_skey() just decrements the instruction address and retries handle_stsch() delivers condition code 3 "operation not supported" handle_chsc() same here handle_stfl() stores the facility list which contains the capabilities of the cpu handle_stidp() stores cpu type/model/revision and such handle_stsi() stores information about the system topology Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>