| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We need to split up the cpu present mask setup from the cpu_data
initialization, and this is a first step towards that.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
prom_nextprop() and prom_firstprop() have slightly different calling
conventions in 32 and 64 bit SPARC.
prom_common.c uses a ifdef guard to ensure that these functions are
called correctly.
Adjust code to eliminate this ifdef by using a calling convention that
is compatible with both 32 and 64 bit SPARC.
Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This broke sparc64 in various ways.
Add an empty dummy hook in sparc32's prom_32.c so that we
can potentially handle things on that side similarly, and
in particular avoid a prom_common.c ifdef :-)
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
To make this work we provide a dummy nop implementation
of of_fill_in_cpu_data() for sparc32.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Unfortunately there is some sparc32/sparc64 ifdef'ery in
here due to the difference in how the prom_firstprop()
and prom_nextprop() routines work.
This will be eliminated eventually.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This will be used in a subsequent changeset.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This is where common code implementations will go as we unify
32-bit and 64-bit OF device tree code.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
