aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2009-05-07x86: fix boot hang in early_reserve_e820()Jan Beulich
If the first non-reserved (sub-)range doesn't fit the size requested, an endless loop will be entered. If a range returned from find_e820_area_size() turns out insufficient in size, the range must be skipped before calling the function again. [ Impact: fixes boot hang on some platforms ] Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2009-03-23x86: e820 fix various signedness issues in setup.c and e820.cJaswinder Singh Rajput
Impact: cleanup This fixed various signedness issues in setup.c and e820.c: arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:455:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness) arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:455:53: expected int *pnr_map arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:455:53: got unsigned int extern [toplevel] *<noident> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:639:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness) arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:639:53: expected int *pnr_map arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:639:53: got unsigned int extern [toplevel] *<noident> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:820:54: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness) arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:820:54: expected int *pnr_map arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:820:54: got unsigned int extern [toplevel] *<noident> arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:670:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness) arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:670:53: expected int *pnr_map arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:670:53: got unsigned int [toplevel] *<noident> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
2009-03-15x86: print out more info in e820_update_range()Yinghai Lu
Impact: help debug e820 bugs Try to print out more info, to catch wrong call parameters. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <49BCB557.3030000@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-03-14x86: make e820_update_range() handle small range updateYinghai Lu
Impact: enhance e820 code to handle more cases Try to handle new range which could be covered by one entry. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: jbeulich@novell.com LKML-Reference: <49B9F0C1.10402@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-03-13x86: fix e820_update_range()Yinghai Lu
Impact: fix left range size on head | commit 5c0e6f035df983210e4d22213aed624ced502d3d | x86: fix code paths used by update_mptable | Impact: fix crashes under Xen due to unrobust e820 code fixes one e820 bug, but introduces another bug. Need to update size for left range at first in case it is header. also add __e820_add_region take more parameter. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: jbeulich@novell.com LKML-Reference: <49B9E286.502@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-03-13x86: fix code paths used by update_mptableJan Beulich
Impact: fix crashes under Xen due to unrobust e820 code find_e820_area_size() must return a properly distinguishable and out-of-bounds value when it fails, and -1UL does not meet that criteria on i386/PAE. Additionally, callers of the function must check against that value. early_reserve_e820() should be prepared for the region found to be outside of the addressable range on 32-bits. e820_update_range_map() should not blindly update e820, but should do all it work on the map it got a pointer passed for (which in 50% of the cases is &e820_saved). It must also not call e820_add_region(), as that again acts on e820 unconditionally. The issues were found when trying to make this option work in our Xen kernel (i.e. where some of the silent assumptions made in the code would not hold). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> LKML-Reference: <49B9171B.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-02-24x86: check range in reserve_early()Yinghai Lu
Impact: cleanup one 32-bit system reports: BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000001c000000 (usable) BIOS-e820: 00000000ffff0000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) DMI 2.0 present. last_pfn = 0x1c000 max_arch_pfn = 0x100000 kernel direct mapping tables up to 1c000000 @ 7000-c000 .. RAMDISK: 1bc69000 - 1bfef4fa .. 0MB HIGHMEM available. 448MB LOWMEM available. mapped low ram: 0 - 1c000000 low ram: 00000000 - 1c000000 bootmap 00002000 - 00005800 (9 early reservations) ==> bootmem [0000000000 - 001c000000] #0 [0000000000 - 0000001000] BIOS data page ==> [0000000000 - 0000001000] #1 [0000001000 - 0000002000] EX TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000001000 - 0000002000] #2 [0000006000 - 0000007000] TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000006000 - 0000007000] #3 [0000400000 - 00009ed14c] TEXT DATA BSS ==> [0000400000 - 00009ed14c] #4 [001bc69000 - 001bfef4fa] RAMDISK ==> [001bc69000 - 001bfef4fa] #5 [00009ee000 - 00009f2000] INIT_PG_TABLE ==> [00009ee000 - 00009f2000] #6 [000009f400 - 0000100000] BIOS reserved ==> [000009f400 - 0000100000] #7 [0000007000 - 0000007000] PGTABLE #8 [0000002000 - 0000006000] BOOTMAP ==> [0000002000 - 0000006000] Notice the strange blank PGTABLE entry. The reason is init_pg_table is big enough, and zero range is called with init_memory_mapping/reserve_early(). So try to check the range in reserve_early() v2: fix the reversed compare Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au Cc: ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-01-09Merge branch 'linus' into releaseLen Brown
2008-12-19x86 hibernate: Mark ACPI NVS memory region at startupRafael J. Wysocki
Introduce new initcall for marking the ACPI NVS memory at startup, so that it can be saved/restored during hibernation/resume. Based on a patch by Zhang Rui. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-12-08x86: change static allocation of trampoline areaRafael J. Wysocki
Impact: fix trampoline sizing bug, save space While debugging a suspend-to-RAM related issue it occured to me that if the trampoline code had grown past 4 KB, we would have been allocating too little memory for it, since the 4 KB size of the trampoline is hardcoded into arch/x86/kernel/e820.c . Change that by making the kernel compute the trampoline size and allocate as much memory as necessary. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-11-01x86: Clean up late e820 resource allocationLinus Torvalds
This makes the late e820 resources use 'insert_resource_expand_to_fit()' instead of doing a 'reserve_region_with_split()', and also avoids marking them as IORESOURCE_BUSY. This results in us being perfectly happy to use pre-existing PCI resources even if they were marked as being in a reserved region, while still avoiding any _new_ allocations in the reserved regions. It also makes for a simpler and more accurate resource tree. Example resource allocation from Jonathan Corbet, who has firmware that has an e820 reserved entry that covered a big range (e0000000-fed003ff), and that had various PCI resources in it set up by firmware. With old kernels, the reserved range would force us to re-allocate all pre-existing PCI resources, and his reserved range would end up looking like this: e0000000-fed003ff : reserved fec00000-fec00fff : IOAPIC 0 fed00000-fed003ff : HPET 0 where only the pre-allocated special regions (IOAPIC and HPET) were kept around. With 2.6.28-rc2, which uses 'reserve_region_with_split()', Jonathan's resource tree looked like this: e0000000-fe7fffff : reserved fe800000-fe8fffff : PCI Bus 0000:01 fe800000-fe8fffff : reserved fe900000-fe9d9aff : reserved fe9d9b00-fe9d9bff : 0000:00:1f.3 fe9d9b00-fe9d9bff : reserved fe9d9c00-fe9d9fff : 0000:00:1a.7 fe9d9c00-fe9d9fff : reserved fe9da000-fe9dafff : 0000:00:03.3 fe9da000-fe9dafff : reserved fe9db000-fe9dbfff : 0000:00:19.0 fe9db000-fe9dbfff : reserved fe9dc000-fe9dffff : 0000:00:1b.0 fe9dc000-fe9dffff : reserved fe9e0000-fe9fffff : 0000:00:19.0 fe9e0000-fe9fffff : reserved fea00000-fea7ffff : 0000:00:02.0 fea00000-fea7ffff : reserved fea80000-feafffff : 0000:00:02.1 fea80000-feafffff : reserved feb00000-febfffff : 0000:00:02.0 feb00000-febfffff : reserved fec00000-fed003ff : reserved fec00000-fec00fff : IOAPIC 0 fed00000-fed003ff : HPET 0 and because the reserved entry had been split and moved into the individual resources, and because it used the IORESOURCE_BUSY flag, the drivers that actually wanted to _use_ those resources couldn't actually attach to them: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: BAR 0: can't reserve mem region [0xfe9e0000-0xfe9fffff] HDA Intel 0000:00:1b.0: BAR 0: can't reserve mem region [0xfe9dc000-0xfe9dffff] with this patch, the resource tree instead becomes e0000000-fed003ff : reserved fe800000-fe8fffff : PCI Bus 0000:01 fe9d9b00-fe9d9bff : 0000:00:1f.3 fe9d9c00-fe9d9fff : 0000:00:1a.7 fe9d9c00-fe9d9fff : ehci_hcd fe9da000-fe9dafff : 0000:00:03.3 fe9db000-fe9dbfff : 0000:00:19.0 fe9db000-fe9dbfff : e1000e fe9dc000-fe9dffff : 0000:00:1b.0 fe9dc000-fe9dffff : ICH HD audio fe9e0000-fe9fffff : 0000:00:19.0 fe9e0000-fe9fffff : e1000e fea00000-fea7ffff : 0000:00:02.0 fea80000-feafffff : 0000:00:02.1 feb00000-febfffff : 0000:00:02.0 fec00000-fec00fff : IOAPIC 0 fed00000-fed003ff : HPET 0 ie the one reserved region now ends up surrounding all the PCI resources that were allocated inside of it by firmware, and because it is not marked BUSY, drivers have no problem attaching to the pre-allocated resources. Reported-and-tested-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-15Merge branches 'core/softlockup', 'core/softirq', 'core/resources', ↵Ingo Molnar
'core/printk' and 'core/misc' into core-v28-for-linus
2008-09-14generic: redefine resource_size_t as phys_addr_tJeremy Fitzhardinge
There's no good reason why a resource_size_t shouldn't just be a physical address, so simply redefine it in terms of phys_addr_t. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-10Merge commit 'v2.6.27-rc6' into x86/unify-cpu-detectIngo Molnar
Conflicts: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common_64.c arch/x86/kernel/cpu/feature_names.c include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-09x86: fix memmap=exactmap boot argumentPrarit Bhargava
When using kdump modifying the e820 map is yielding strange results. For example starting with BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000100 - 0000000000093400 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0000000000093400 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000003fee0000 (usable) BIOS-e820: 000000003fee0000 - 000000003fef3000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: 000000003fef3000 - 000000003ff80000 (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: 000000003ff80000 - 0000000040000000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec10000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000ff000000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) and booting with args memmap=exactmap memmap=640K@0K memmap=5228K@16384K memmap=125188K@22252K memmap=76K#1047424K memmap=564K#1047500K resulted in: user-defined physical RAM map: user: 0000000000000000 - 0000000000093400 (usable) user: 0000000000093400 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) user: 0000000000100000 - 000000003fee0000 (usable) user: 000000003fee0000 - 000000003fef3000 (ACPI data) user: 000000003fef3000 - 000000003ff80000 (ACPI NVS) user: 000000003ff80000 - 0000000040000000 (reserved) user: 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved) user: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec10000 (reserved) user: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) user: 00000000ff000000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) But should have resulted in: user-defined physical RAM map: user: 0000000000000000 - 00000000000a0000 (usable) user: 0000000001000000 - 000000000151b000 (usable) user: 00000000015bb000 - 0000000008ffc000 (usable) user: 000000003fee0000 - 000000003ff80000 (ACPI data) This is happening because of an improper usage of strcmp() in the e820 parsing code. The strcmp() always returns !0 and never resets the value for e820.nr_map and returns an incorrect user-defined map. This patch fixes the problem. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-04x86: split e820 reserved entries record to late, v7Yinghai Lu
try to insert_resource second time, by expanding the resource... for case: e820 reserved entry is partially overlapped with bar res... hope it will never happen Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-04x86: split e820 reserved entries record to late v4Ingo Molnar
this one replaces: | commit a2bd7274b47124d2fc4dfdb8c0591f545ba749dd | Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> | Date: Mon Aug 25 00:56:08 2008 -0700 | | x86: fix HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25, check hpet against BAR, v3 v2: insert e820 reserve resources before pnp_system_init v3: fix merging problem in tip/x86/core v4: address Linus's review about comments and condition in _late() Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-04x86: split e820 reserved entries record to late v2Yinghai Lu
so could let BAR res register at first, or even pnp. v2: insert e820 reserve resources before pnp_system_init Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-21x86, e820: add support for AddressRangeUnusuable ACPI memory typeCihula, Joseph
Add support for the E820_UNUSABLE memory type, which is defined in Revision 3.0b (Oct. 10, 2006) of the ACPI Specification on p. 394 Table 14-1: AddressRangeUnusuable This range of address contains memory in which errors have been detected. This range must not be used by the OSPM. Signed-off-by: Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-20x86: introduce x86_quirksYinghai Lu
introduce x86_quirks array of boot-time quirk methods. No change in functionality intended. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-20x86: improve debug printout: add target bootmem range in early_res_to_bootmem()Yinghai Lu
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-18x86: remove arch_get_ram_rangeYinghai Lu
no user now Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-07-13x86, e820: remove end_user_pfnYinghai Lu
end_user_pfn used to modify the meaning of the e820 maps. Now that all e820 operations are cleaned up, unified, tightened up, the e820 map always get updated to reality, we don't need to keep this secondary mechanism anymore. If you hit this commit in bisection it means something slipped through. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-11Merge branch 'x86/generalize-visws' into x86/coreIngo Molnar
2008-07-11x86: introduce max_low_pfn_mapped for 64-bitYinghai Lu
when more than 4g memory is installed, don't map the big hole below 4g. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-11x86: e820: user-defined memory maps: remove the range instead of update it ↵Yinghai Lu
to reserved also let mem= to print out modified e820 map too Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-10x86: add early quirk supportIngo Molnar
Add early quirks support. In preparation of enabling the generic architecture to boot on a VISWS. This will allow us to remove the VISWS subarch and all its complications. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-10x86: make e820_end return end_of_ram again for 64bitYinghai Lu
even on 64bit systems with less than 4G RAM, we can now use fixmap to handle acpi SIT near end of ram. change e820_end to e820_end_of_ram again? or e820_ram_pfn? Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: e820 memmap - add checking for NULL early paramCyrill Gorcunov
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: andi@firstfloor.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: make e820_end return max ram type only for 32 bitYinghai Lu
to avoid warning from find_low_pfn_range for high pages size etc Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: make max_pfn cover acpi table below 4gYinghai Lu
When system have 4g less ram installed, and acpi table sit near end of ram, make max_pfn cover them too, so 64bit kernel don't need to mess up fixmap. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: "Suresh Siddha" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: let early_reserve_e820 update e820_saved tooYinghai Lu
so when it is called after early_param, e820_saved get updated too. esp for mpc update. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: move saving e820_saved to setup_memory_mapYinghai Lu
so other path that will override memory_setup or machine_specific_memory_setup could have e820_saved too. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> Cc: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: use FIRMWARE_MEMMAP on x86/E820Bernhard Walle
This patch uses the /sys/firmware/memmap interface provided in the last patch on the x86 architecture when E820 is used. The patch copies the E820 memory map very early, and registers the E820 map afterwards via firmware_map_add_early(). Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> Acked-by: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Cc: yhlu.kernel@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: make early_res_to_bootmem print out less 80 width charsYinghai Lu
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: change copy_e820_map to append_e820_mapYinghai Lu
so it has a more meaningful name. also change it to static. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: cleanup e820_setup_gap(), v2Alok Kataria
e820_search_gap also take a end_addr parameter to limit search from start_addr to end_addr. Signed-off-by: AloK N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: "lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: move reserve_setup_data to setup.cYinghai Lu
Ying Huang would like setup_data to be reserved, but not included in the no save range. Here we try to modify the e820 table to reserve that range early. also add that in early_res in case bootloader messes up with the ramdisk. other solution would be 1. add early_res_to_highmem... 2. early_res_to_e820... but they could reserve another type memory wrongly, if early_res has some resource reserved early, and not needed later, but it is not removed from early_res in time. Like the RAMDISK (already handled). Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: andi@firstfloor.org Tested-by: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: fix warning in e820_reserve_resources with 32bitYinghai Lu
when 64bit resource is not enabled, we get: arch/x86/kernel/e820.c: In function ‘e820_reserve_resources’: arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:1217: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type because res->start/end is resource_t aka u32. it will overflow. fix it with temp end of u64 Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: early res print out alignment v2Yinghai Lu
v2: fix print info to cont Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: limit E820 map when a user-defined memory map is specifiedBernhard Walle
This patch brings back limiting of the E820 map when a user-defined E820 map is specified. While the behaviour of i386 (32 bit) was to limit the E820 map (and /proc/iomem), the behaviour of x86-64 (64 bit) was not to limit. That patch limits the E820 map again for both x86 architectures. Code was tested for compilation and booting on a 32 bit and 64 bit system. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com Cc: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08mm, generic, x86 boot: more tweaks to hex prints of some pfn addressesPaul Jackson
Fix some problems with (and applies on top of) a previous patch: x86 boot: show pfn addresses in hex not decimal in some kernel info printks Primarily change "0x%8lx" format, which displays with a right aligned space filled hex number (spaces between the "0x" prefix and the number), into "%0#10lx" format, which zero fills instead of space fills, and which uses the printf flag '#' to request the "0x" prefix instead of hard coding it. Also replace some other "0x%lx" formats with "%#lx", making use of the '#' printf flag again. Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Cc: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: "Jack Steiner" <steiner@sgi.com> Cc: "Mike Travis" <travis@sgi.com> Cc: "Huang Cc: Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: cleanup e820_setup_gap(), add e820_search_gap(), v2Alok Kataria
This is a preparatory patch for the next patch in series. Moves some code from e820_setup_gap to a new function e820_search_gap. This patch is a part of a bug fix where we walk the ACPI table to calculate a gap for PCI optional devices. v1->v2: Patch on top of tip/master. Fixes a bug introduced in the last patch about the typeof "last". Also the new function e820_search_gap now returns if we found a gap in e820_map. Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com> Cc: lenb@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: remove end_pfn in 64bitYinghai Lu
and use max_pfn directly. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: change size if e820_update/remove_rangeYinghai Lu
in case someone using crazy parameter while calling them. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: fix e820_update_range size when overlappingYinghai Lu
before that we relay on sanitize_e820_map to remove the overlap. but e820_update_range(,,E820_RESERVED, E820_RAM) will not work this patch fix that who is going to use this? Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86 boot: show pfn addresses in hex not decimal in some kernel info printksPaul Jackson
Page frame numbers (the portion of physical addresses above the low order page offsets) are displayed in several kernel debug and info prints in decimal, not hex. Decimal addresse are unreadable. Use hex. Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Cc: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: "Jack Steiner" <steiner@sgi.com> Cc: "Mike Travis" <travis@sgi.com> Cc: "Huang Cc: Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86 boot: allow overlapping early reserve memory rangesPaul Jackson
Add support for overlapping early memory reservations. In general, they still can't overlap, and will panic with "Overlapping early reservations" if they do overlap. But if a memory range is reserved with the new call: reserve_early_overlap_ok() rather than with the usual call: reserve_early() then subsequent early reservations are allowed to overlap. This new reserve_early_overlap_ok() call is only used in one place so far, which is the "BIOS reserved" reservation for the the EBDA region, which out of Paranoia reserves more than what the BIOS might have specified, and which thus might overlap with another legitimate early memory reservation (such as, perhaps, the EFI memmap.) Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Cc: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: "Jack Steiner" <steiner@sgi.com> Cc: "Mike Travis" <travis@sgi.com> Cc: "Huang Cc: Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86 boot: e820 code indentation fixPaul Jackson
Fix indentation. An earlier code merge got the indentation of four lines of code off by a tab. Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Cc: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: "Jack Steiner" <steiner@sgi.com> Cc: "Mike Travis" <travis@sgi.com> Cc: "Huang Cc: Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: add e820_remove_rangeYinghai Lu
... so could add real hole in e820 agp check is using request_mem_region, and could fail if e820 is reserved... Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-14 04:24:21 +0000