| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Return logic was inverted.
Going for changing the return value to not return zero as it is makes
more sense regarding the naming of the function (cpu_has_cpufreq()).
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3410
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3410
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=131543
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Karasyov <konstantin.a.karasyov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu Luming <luming.yu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
