aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi/sleep
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2008-04-01ACPI PM: Restore the 2.6.24 suspend orderingRafael J. Wysocki
Some time ago it turned out that our suspend code ordering broke some NVidia-based systems that hung if _PTS was executed with one of the PCI devices, specifically a USB controller, in a low power state. Then, it was noticed that the suspend code ordering was not compliant with ACPI 1.0, although it was compliant with ACPI 2.0 (and later), and it was argued that the code had to be changed for that reason (ref. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528). So we did, but evidently we did wrong, because it's now turning out that some systems have been broken by this change. Refs: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10340 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374217#c16 [ I said at that time that something like this might happend, but the majority of people involved thought that it was improbable due to the necessity to preserve the compliance of hardware with ACPI 1.0. ] This actually is a quite serious regression from 2.6.24. Moreover, the ACPI 1.0 ordering of suspend code introduced another issue that I have only noticed recently. Namely, if the suspend of one of devices fails, the already suspended devices will be resumed without executing _WAK before, which leads to problems on some systems (for example, in such situations thermal management is broken on my HP nx6325). Consequently, it also breaks suspend debugging on the affected systems. Note also, that the requirement to execute _PTS before suspending devices does not really make sense, because the device in question may be put into a low power state at run time for a reason unrelated to a system-wide suspend. For the reasons outlined above, the change of the suspend ordering should be reverted, which is done by the patch below. [ Felix Möller: "I am the reporter from the original Novell Bug: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374217 I just tried current git head (two hours ago) with the patch (the one from the beginning of this thread) from Rafael and without it. With the patch my MacBook does suspend without it does not." ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Tested-by: Felix Möller <felix@derklecks.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-03-11ACPI: replace remaining __FUNCTION__ occurrencesHarvey Harrison
__FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__ Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-07Merge branches 'release', 'misc' and 'misc-2.6.25' into releaseLen Brown
2008-02-07Merge branches 'release', 'bugzilla-6217', 'bugzilla-6629', 'bugzilla-6933', ↵Len Brown
'bugzilla-7186', 'bugzilla-8269', 'bugzilla-8570', 'bugzilla-9139', 'bugzilla-9277', 'bugzilla-9341', 'bugzilla-9444', 'bugzilla-9614', 'bugzilla-9643' and 'bugzilla-9644' into release
2008-02-07Merge branches 'release', 'acpi_pm_device_sleep_state' and 'battery' into ↵Len Brown
release
2008-02-07PM: documentation cleanupsPavel Machek
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI: Print message before calling _PTSRafael J. Wysocki
Make acpi_sleep_prepare() static and cause it to print a message specifying the ACPI system sleep state to be entered (helpful for debugging the suspend/hibernation code). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI hibernation: Call _PTS before suspending devicesRafael J. Wysocki
The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI 2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order. The current hibernation code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which may cause some ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during hibernation (ref. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528). Make the hibernation code execute _PTS before putting devices into low power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) with the possibility to override that using the 'acpi_new_pts_ordering' kernel command line option. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01Hibernation: Introduce begin() and end() callbacksRafael J. Wysocki
Introduce global hibernation callback .end() and rename global hibernation callback .start() to .begin(), in analogy with the recent modifications of the global suspend callbacks. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI suspend: Call _PTS before suspending devicesRafael J. Wysocki
The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI 2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order. The current suspend code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which causes some ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during suspend (ref. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528). Make the suspend code execute _PTS before putting devices into low power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) and provide a command line option to override the default if need be. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI: Separate disabling of GPEs from _PTSRafael J. Wysocki
The preparation to enter an ACPI system sleep state is now tied to the disabling of GPEs, but the GPEs should not be disabled before suspending devices. Since on ACPI 1.0x systems the _PTS global control method should be executed before suspending devices, we need to disable GPEs separately. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI: Separate invocations of _GTS and _BFS from _PTS and _WAKRafael J. Wysocki
The execution of ACPI global control methods _GTS and _BFS is currently tied to the preparation to enter a sleep state and to the leaving of the sleep state, respectively. However, these functions are called before disabling the nonboot CPUs and after enabling them, respectively (in fact, on ACPI 1.0x systems the first of them ought to be called before suspending devices), while according to the ACPI specification, _GTS is to be executed right prior to entering the system sleep state and _BFS is to be executed right after the platfor firmware has returned control to the OS on wake up. Move the execution of _GTS and _BFS to the right places. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01Suspend: Introduce begin() and end() callbacksRafael J. Wysocki
On ACPI systems the target state set by acpi_pm_set_target() is reset by acpi_pm_finish(), but that need not be called if the suspend fails.  All platforms that use the .set_target() global suspend callback are affected by analogous issues. For this reason, we need an additional global suspend callback that will reset the target state regardless of whether or not the suspend is successful.  Also, it is reasonable to rename the .set_target() callback, since it will be used for a different purpose on ACPI systems (due to ACPI 1.0x code ordering requirements). Introduce the global suspend callback .end() to be executed at the end of the suspend sequence and rename the .set_target() global suspend callback to .begin(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI: clear GPE earily in resume to avoid warningShaohua Li
Wakeup GPE hasn't a handler. If system is waked up by such GPE like a USB hotplug, I saw a lot of error reporting the GPE hasn't handler. acpi_leave_sleep_state will clear the GPE but it's too late, we should do it before interrupt is re-enabled. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-01ACPI: Fix mismerge in acpi_hibernation_finishRafael J. Wysocki
Some code in acpi_hibernation_finish() was moved to acpi_hibernation_leave(), but the old copy had been left (it's harmless, but also useless). Remove it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-11ACPI: Fix acpi_pm_device_sleep_state()Rafael J. Wysocki
Fix acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() to return the value returned by _SxD if the device is supposed to wake up the system from given sleep state and the evaluation of _SxW fails (e.g. _SxW is not present). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-12-27ACPI: detect invalid argument written to /proc/acpi/alarmSigned-off by Yi Yang
/proc/acpi/alarm can't be set correctly, here is a sample: [root@localhost /]# echo "2006 09" > /proc/acpi/alarm [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm 2007-12-09 09:09:09 [root@localhost /]# echo "2006 04" > /proc/acpi/alarm [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm 2007-12-04 04:04:04 [root@localhost /]# Obviously, it is wrong, it should consider it as an invalid input. after this patch: [root@localhost /]# echo "2008 09" > /proc/acpi/alarm -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost /]# Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-12-27ACPI: /proc/acpi/alarm parsing: handle large numbers properlyYi Yang
In function acpi_system_write_alarm in file drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c, big sec, min, hr, mo, day and yr are counted twice to get reasonable values, that is very superfluous, we can do that only once. In additon, /proc/acpi/alarm can set a related value which can be specified as YYYY years MM months DD days HH hours MM minutes SS senconds, it isn't a date, so you can specify as +0000-00-00 96:00:00 , that means 3 days later, current code can't handle such a case. This patch removes unnecessary code and does with the aforementioned situation. Before applying this patch: [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm 2007-12-00 00:00:00 [root@localhost /]# echo "0000-00-00 96:180:180" > /proc/acpi/alarm [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm 0007-12-02 **:**:** [root@localhost /]# After applying this patch: [root@localhost ~]# echo "2007-12-00 00:00:00" > /proc/acpi/alarm [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm 2007-12-00 00:00:00 [root@localhost ~]# echo "0000-00-00 96:180:180" > /proc/acpi/alarm [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm 0007-12-04 03:03:00 [root@localhost ~]# Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-10-29Pull alexey-fixes into release branchLen Brown
2007-10-25Fix /proc/acpi/alarm BCD alarm encodingsLinus Torvalds
This fixes some totally illogical and wrong code that converts things to and from BCD mode essentially randomly, does math on values in BCD mode etc etc. Introduce a few helper functions to make it a bit more obvious what is going on, and make sure that we always do all the arithmetic (and anythign else, for that matter) in binary, not BCD. Tested by Mark Lord, who found the problem originally, and also pushed the patch back and reminded me about it. Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-25ACPI: suspend: Wrong order of GPE restore.Alexey Starikovskiy
acpi_leave_sleep_state() should have correct list of wake and runtime GPEs, which is available only after disable_wakeup_device() is called. Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-10-25ACPI: sleep: Fix GPE suspend cleanupAlexey Starikovskiy
Commit 9b039330808b83acac3597535da26f47ad1862ce removed acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare(), the only function used at S5 transition Add call to generic acpi_enable_wake_device(). Reference: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299882 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-10-19Merge branch 'release' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 * 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6: (41 commits) ACPICA: hw: Don't carry spinlock over suspend ACPICA: hw: remove use_lock flag from acpi_hw_register_{read, write} ACPI: cpuidle: port idle timer suspend/resume workaround to cpuidle ACPI: clean up acpi_enter_sleep_state_prep Hibernation: Make sure that ACPI is enabled in acpi_hibernation_finish ACPI: suppress uninitialized var warning cpuidle: consolidate 2.6.22 cpuidle branch into one patch ACPI: thinkpad-acpi: skip blanks before the data when parsing sysfs ACPI: AC: Add sysfs interface ACPI: SBS: Add sysfs alarm ACPI: SBS: Add ACPI_PROCFS around procfs handling code. ACPI: SBS: Add support for power_supply class (and sysfs) ACPI: SBS: Make SBS reads table-driven. ACPI: SBS: Simplify data structures in SBS ACPI: SBS: Split host controller (ACPI0001) from SBS driver (ACPI0002) ACPI: EC: Add new query handler to list head. ACPI: Add acpi_bus_generate_event4() function ACPI: Battery: add sysfs alarm ACPI: Battery: Add sysfs support ACPI: Battery: Misc clean-ups, no functional changes ... Fix up conflicts in drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.[ch] manually
2007-10-18Hibernation: Check if ACPI is enabled during restore in the right placeRafael J. Wysocki
The following scenario leads to total confusion of the platform firmware on some boxes (eg. HPC nx6325): * Hibernate with ACPI enabled * Resume passing "acpi=off" to the boot kernel To prevent this from happening it's necessary to check if ACPI is enabled (and enable it if that's not the case) _right_ _after_ control has been transfered from the boot kernel to the image kernel, before device_power_up() is called (ie. with interrupts disabled).  Enabling ACPI after calling device_power_up() turns out to be insufficient. For this reason, introduce new hibernation callback ->leave() that will be executed before device_power_up() by the restored image kernel.  To make it work, it also is necessary to move swsusp_suspend() from swsusp.c to disk.c (it's name is changed to "create_image", which is more up to the point). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-18PM: Rename hibernation_ops to platform_hibernation_opsRafael J. Wysocki
Rename 'struct hibernation_ops' to 'struct platform_hibernation_ops' in analogy with 'struct platform_suspend_ops'. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-18PM: Rework struct hibernation_opsRafael J. Wysocki
During hibernation we also need to tell the ACPI core that we're going to put the system into the S4 sleep state. For this reason, an additional method in 'struct hibernation_ops' is needed, playing the role of set_target() in 'struct platform_suspend_operations'. Moreover, the role of the .prepare() method is now different, so it's better to introduce another method, that in general may be different from .prepare(), that will be used to prepare the platform for creating the hibernation image (.prepare() is used anyway to notify the platform that we're going to enter the low power state after the image has been saved). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-18PM: Rework struct platform_suspend_opsRafael J. Wysocki
There is no reason why the .prepare() and .finish() methods in 'struct platform_suspend_ops' should take any arguments, since architectures don't use these methods' argument in any practically meaningful way (ie. either the target system sleep state is conveyed to the platform by .set_target(), or there is only one suspend state supported and it is indicated to the PM core by .valid(), or .prepare() and .finish() aren't defined at all).  There also is no reason why .finish() should return any result. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-18PM: Rename struct pm_ops and related thingsRafael J. Wysocki
The name of 'struct pm_ops' suggests that it is related to the power management in general, but in fact it is only related to suspend.  Moreover, its name should indicate what this structure is used for, so it seems reasonable to change it to 'struct platform_suspend_ops'.  In that case, the name of the global variable of this type used by the PM core and the names of related functions should be changed accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-10Pull bugzilla-292300 into release branchLen Brown
2007-10-10Hibernation: Make sure that ACPI is enabled in acpi_hibernation_finishRafael J. Wysocki
If the BIOS does not enable ACPI and the "acpi=off" command line parameter is passed to the boot kernel, ACPI may be disabled when the (restored) image kernel attempts to execute acpi_hibernation_finish(). To prevent this from happening we can call acpi_enable() from acpi_hibernation_finish() (if ACPI is already enabled, this will have no effect). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-10-09drivers/firmware: const-ify DMI API and internalsJeff Garzik
Three main sets of changes: 1) dmi_get_system_info() return value should have been marked const, since callers should not be changing that data. 2) const-ify DMI internals, since DMI firmware tables should, whenever possible, be marked const to ensure we never ever write to that data area. 3) const-ify DMI API, to enable marking tables const where possible in low-level drivers. And if we're really lucky, this might enable some additional optimizations on the part of the compiler. The bulk of the changes are #2 and #3, which are interrelated. #1 could have been a separate patch, but it was so small compared to the others, it was easier to roll it into this changeset. Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2007-09-27ACPI: Hibernate erroneously disabled Suspend wakeup devicesAlexey Starikovskiy
S4 suspend to disk will disable GPE's permanently because acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare() does not have a counterpart at resume time. Thus, those devices became unavailable for wakeup from subsequent S3 suspend-to-ram. Here acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare() is removed, and upon suspend acpi_enable_wakeup_device() gets its functionality. Upon resume, acpi_disable_wakeup_device() restores the state. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292300 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-09-25ACPI: CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)Alexey Starikovskiy
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-09-25ACPI: suspend: build-fix for CONFIG_SUSPEND=n and CONFIG_HIBERNATION=yAlexey Starikovskiy
This fixes compilation with CONFIG_SUSPEND unset and CONFIG_HIBERNATION set (raf. http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=119055289723895&w=4). Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-09-21ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling of Sx states addendumFrans Pop
Make the S0 state be always reported as supported Signed-off: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Acked-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-09-20ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling of Sx states.Alexey Starikovskiy
Recent changes to sleep initialization in ACPI dropped reporting of supported Sx states above S3. Fix that and also move S5 init into same file as other Sx. The only functional change is adding printk() for S4 and S5 cases. Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-08-28ACPI: (more) delete CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_SLEEP (again)Christian Borntraeger
Commit 2bcf9dddeb8e79a4ba55bf191533f70f39ce ('ACPI: delete CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_SLEEP (again)') was incomplete. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-08-25ACPI: "ACPI handle has no context!" should be KERN_DEBUGShaohua Li
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-29ACPI: restore CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEPLen Brown
Restore the 2.6.22 CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP build option, but now shadowing the new CONFIG_PM_SLEEP option. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> [ Modified to work with the PM config setup changes. ] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-29Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND for suspend-to-Ram and standbyRafael J. Wysocki
Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND representing the ability to enter system sleep states, such as the ACPI S3 state, and allow the user to choose SUSPEND and HIBERNATION independently of each other. Make HOTPLUG_CPU be selected automatically if SUSPEND or HIBERNATION has been chosen and the kernel is intended for SMP systems. Also, introduce CONFIG_PM_SLEEP which is automatically selected if CONFIG_SUSPEND or CONFIG_HIBERNATION is set and use it to select the code needed for both suspend and hibernation. The top-level power management headers and the ACPI code related to suspend and hibernation are modified to use the new definitions (the changes in drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c are, mostly, moving code to reduce the number of ifdefs). There are many other files in which CONFIG_PM can be replaced with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP or even with CONFIG_SUSPEND, but they can be updated in the future. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-29Replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATIONRafael J. Wysocki
Replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION to avoid confusion (among other things, with CONFIG_SUSPEND introduced in the next patch). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-25Pull d-states into release branchLen Brown
Conflicts: drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-25ACPI: Kconfig: remove CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP from sourceLen Brown
As it was a synonym for (CONFIG_ACPI && CONFIG_X86), the ifdefs for it were more clutter than they were worth. For ia64, just add a few stubs in anticipation of future S3 or S4 support. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-24ACPI: Remove references to ACPI_STATE_S2 from acpi_pm_enterRafael J. Wysocki
Remove references to ACPI_STATE_S2, introduced by acpi-implement-the-set_target-callback-from-pm_ops.patch, from acpi_pm_enter(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-24ACPI: Kconfig: fold /proc/acpi/sleep under CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFSLen Brown
/proc/acpi/sleep has had its own "default n" option, ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_SLEEP, for many months. Time to delete ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_SLEEP. Users that still need /proc/acpi/sleep can still get it along with the other deprecated /proc/acpi files by enabling CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS. Also delete ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS, which was an umbrella for /proc/acpi/sleep, wakeup, alarm, because it was effectively just a synonym for ACPI_SLEEP. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-22ACPI: Add acpi_pm_device_sleep_state helper routineShaohua Li
Based on the David Brownell's patch at http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=117873972806360&w=2 updated by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Add a helper routine returning the lowest power (highest number) ACPI device power state that given device can be in while the system is in the sleep state indicated by acpi_target_sleep_state . Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-22ACPI: Implement the set_target() callback from pm_opsRafael J. Wysocki
In the future some drivers may need to use ACPI to determine the low power states in which to place their devices, but to provide the drivers with this information the ACPI core needs to know what sleep state the system is going to enter. Namely, the device's state should not be too high power for given system sleep state and, if the device is supposed to be able to wake up the system, its state should not be too low power for the wake up to be possible). For this purpose, the ACPI core needs to implement the set_target() method in 'struct pm_ops' and store the target system sleep state passed by the PM core in a variable. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Acked-by: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-22Pull misc into release branchLen Brown
Conflicts: Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
2007-07-19PM: Introduce pm_power_off_prepareRafael J. Wysocki
Introduce the pm_power_off_prepare() callback that can be registered by the interested platforms in analogy with pm_idle() and pm_power_off(), used for preparing the system to power off (needed by ACPI). This allows us to drop acpi_sysclass and device_acpi that are only defined in order to register the ACPI power off preparation callback, which is needed by pm_power_off() registered in a much different way. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-19ACPI: Do not prepare for hibernation in acpi_shutdownRafael J. Wysocki
Since we are now explicitly calling hibernation_ops->prepare() before hibernation_ops->enter() in hibernation_platform_enter() (defined in kernel/power/disk.c), ACPI should not call acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S4) from acpi_shutdown(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>