| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Check for ACPI resource conflicts in i2c bus drivers. I've included
all recent SMBus master drivers for PC hardware.
I've voluntarily left out:
* Drivers that don't run on PCs: they can't conflict with ACPI.
* Bit-banged bus device drivers: it's very unlikely that ACPI would
deal with such buses.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
|
|
Let general purpose I2C/SMBus bus drivers add SPD to their class. Once
this is done, we will be able to tell the eeprom driver to only probe
for SPD EEPROMs and similar on these buses.
Note that I took a conservative approach here, adding I2C_CLASS_SPD to
many drivers that have no idea whether they can host SPD EEPROMs or not.
This is to make sure that the eeprom driver doesn't stop probing buses
where SPD EEPROMs or equivalent live.
So, bus driver maintainers and users should feel free to remove the SPD
class from drivers those buses never have SPD EEPROMs or they don't
want the eeprom driver to bind to them. Likewise, feel free to add the
SPD class to any bus driver I might have missed.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
|
|
New i2c bus driver for the Intel SCH chipsets (AF82US15W, AF82US15L,
AF82UL11L).
Signed-off-by: Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
|
