Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
- Move it into a separate file; clean and streamline it
- Restructure the init code for reuse during secondary dispatch
- Support both levels (primary, secondary) of IRQ dispatch
- Use a workqueue for irq mask/unmask and trigger configuration
Code for two subchips currently share that secondary handler code.
One is the power subchip; its IRQs are now handled by this core,
courtesy of this patch. The other is the GPIO module, which will
be supported through a later patch.
There are also minor changes to the header file, mostly related
to GPIO support; nothing yet in mainline cares about those. A
few references to OMAP-specific symbols are disabled; when they
can all be removed, the TWL4030 support ceases being OMAP-specific.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
|
|
Simplify twl4030 IRQ handling by removing a needless custom flow
handler. The top level IRQs, from the PIH, are well suited for
handle_simple_irq() ... they can't be acked or masked.
Switching resolves some issues with how IRQs were dispatched.
Notably, abuse of desc->status, IRQ accounting, and handling
of various faults.
In short, use standard genirq code.
Drivers that request_irq() to the PIH will need to pay more
attention to things like setting IRQF_DISABLED (since it's
no longer ignored), and making I2C calls from handlers (you'll
need a lockdep workaround).
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
|
|
This patch adds the core of the TWL4030 driver, which supports
chips including the TPS65950. These chips are multi-function; see
http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/tps65950.html
Public specs are in the works. For now, the block diagram on
the second page of the datasheet is fairly informative.
There are some known issues with this core code. Most notably,
the IRQ dispatching needs simplification (to use more of genirq),
generalization (integrating support for secondary IRQ dispatch
as well as primary, and removing the build dependency on OMAP),
and then probably updating to leverage threaded IRQ support
(expected to arrive in mainline "soon").
Once the core is in mainline, drivers for other parts of this
chip can follow its lead and start swimming upstream too.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
|