| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The function thermal_cooling_device_register always returns either a valid
pointer or a value made with ERR_PTR, so a test for non-zero on the result
will always succeed.
The problem was found using the following semantic match.
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//<smpl>
@a@
expression E, E1;
statement S,S1;
position p;
@@
E = thermal_cooling_device_register(...)
... when != E = E1
if@p (E) S else S1
@n@
position a.p;
expression E,E1;
statement S,S1;
@@
E = NULL
... when != E = E1
if@p (E) S else S1
@depends on !n@
expression E;
statement S,S1;
position a.p;
@@
* if@p (E)
S else S1
//</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: Thomas Sujith <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the
beginning of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an
obsolescent feature.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
|
|
Need to extract errors using PTR_ERR macro and
process accordingly.thermal_cooling_device_register
returning NULL means that CONFIG_THERMAL=n and in that
case no need to create symbolic links.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sujith <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Intel menlow platform specific driver for thermal management extension.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sujith <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
