| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Linux-formatted jfs partitions have a different idea about what i_size
represents than partitions formatted on OS/2. The i_size calculation is
now based on the size of the directory index. For legacy partitions, which
have no directory index, the i_size is never being updated.
This patch adds back the original i_size calculations for legacy partitions.
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
|
|
A failure in dbAlloc caused a directory's i_blocks to be incorrectly
incremented, causing jfs_fsck to find the inode to be corrupt.
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
|
|
I'm finally getting around to cleaning out debug code that I've never used.
There has always been code ifdef'ed out by _JFS_DEBUG_DMAP, _JFS_DEBUG_IMAP,
_JFS_DEBUG_DTREE, and _JFS_DEBUG_XTREE, which I have personally never used,
and I doubt that anyone has since the design stage back in OS/2. There is
also a function, xtGather, that has never been used, and I don't know why it
was ever there.
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
|
|
add_missing_indices() must set tlck->type to tlckBTROOT when modifying
a root btree root to avoid a trap in txRelease()
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
|
|
Modify xtSearch so that it returns the next allocated block when the
requested block is unmapped. This can be used to make sure we don't
create a new extent that overlaps the next one.
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
JFS code has always assumed a page size of 4K. This patch fixes the
non-pagecache uses of pages to deal with larger pages.
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
