aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/lockd/svclock.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2008-07-15SUNRPC: Remove the BKL from the callback functionsTrond Myklebust
Push it into those callback functions that actually need it. Note that all the NFS operations use their own locking, so don't need the BKL. Ditto for the rpcbind client. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2008-04-30fs: replace remaining __FUNCTION__ occurrencesHarvey Harrison
__FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__ Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-25locks: don't call ->copy_lock methods on return of conflicting locksJ. Bruce Fields
The file_lock structure is used both as a heavy-weight representation of an active lock, with pointers to reference-counted structures, etc., and as a simple container for parameters that describe a file lock. The conflicting lock returned from __posix_lock_file is an example of the latter; so don't call the filesystem or lock manager callbacks when copying to it. This also saves the need for an unnecessary locks_init_lock in the nfsv4 server. Thanks to Trond for pointing out the error. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2008-04-23lockd: Fix stale nlmsvc_unlink_block commentJ. Bruce Fields
As of 5996a298da43a03081e9ba2116983d173001c862 ("NLM: don't unlock on cancel requests") we no longer unlock in this case, so the comment is no longer accurate. Thanks to Stuart Friedberg for pointing out the inconsistency. Cc: Stuart Friedberg <sfriedberg@hp.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2008-04-23NLM: Convert lockd to use kthreadsJeff Layton
Have lockd_up start lockd using kthread_run. With this change, lockd_down now blocks until lockd actually exits, so there's no longer need for the waitqueue code at the end of lockd_down. This also means that only one lockd can be running at a time which simplifies the code within lockd's main loop. This also adds a check for kthread_should_stop in the main loop of nlmsvc_retry_blocked and after that function returns. There's no sense continuing to retry blocks if lockd is coming down anyway. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2008-02-10NLM: don't requeue block if it was invalidated while GRANT_MSG was in flightJeff Layton
It's possible for lockd to catch a SIGKILL while a GRANT_MSG callback is in flight. If this happens we don't want lockd to insert the block back into the nlm_blocked list. This helps that situation, but there's still a possible race. Fixing that will mean adding real locking for nlm_blocked. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2008-02-10NLM: don't reattempt GRANT_MSG when there is already an RPC in flightJeff Layton
With the current scheme in nlmsvc_grant_blocked, we can end up with more than one GRANT_MSG callback for a block in flight. Right now, we requeue the block unconditionally so that a GRANT_MSG callback is done again in 30s. If the client is unresponsive, it can take more than 30s for the call already in flight to time out. There's no benefit to having more than one GRANT_MSG RPC queued up at a time, so put it on the list with a timeout of NLM_NEVER before doing the RPC call. If the RPC call submission fails, we requeue it with a short timeout. If it works, then nlmsvc_grant_callback will end up requeueing it with a shorter timeout after it completes. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2008-02-01Leak in nlmsvc_testlock for async GETFL caseOleg Drokin
Fix nlm_block leak for the case of supplied blocking lock info. Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2008-02-01lockd: fix a leak in nlmsvc_testlock asynchronous request handlingOleg Drokin
Without the patch, there is a leakage of nlmblock structure refcount that holds a reference nlmfile structure, that holds a reference to struct file, when async GETFL is used (-EINPROGRESS return from file_ops->lock()), and also in some error cases. Fix up a style nit while we're here. Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-10-09NLM: Fix a memory leak in nlmsvc_testlockTrond Myklebust
The recent fix for a circular lock dependency unfortunately introduced a potential memory leak in the event where the call to nlmsvc_lookup_host fails for some reason. Thanks to Roel Kluin for spotting this. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-09-26NLM: Fix a circular lock dependency in lockdTrond Myklebust
The problem is that the garbage collector for the 'host' structures nlm_gc_hosts(), holds nlm_host_mutex while calling down to nlmsvc_mark_resources, which, eventually takes the file->f_mutex. We cannot therefore call nlmsvc_lookup_host() from within nlmsvc_create_block, since the caller will already hold file->f_mutex, so the attempt to grab nlm_host_mutex may deadlock. Fix the problem by calling nlmsvc_lookup_host() outside the file->f_mutex. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-26lockd and nfsd endianness annotation fixesAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-06lockd: add code to handle deferred lock requestsMarc Eshel
Rewrite nlmsvc_lock() to use the asynchronous interface. As with testlock, we answer nlm requests in nlmsvc_lock by first looking up the block and then using the results we find in the block if B_QUEUED is set, and calling vfs_lock_file() otherwise. If this a new lock request and we get -EINPROGRESS return on a non-blocking request then we defer the request. Also modify nlmsvc_unlock() to call the filesystem method if appropriate. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-05-06lockd: always preallocate block in nlmsvc_lock()Marc Eshel
Normally we could skip ever having to allocate a block in the case where the client asks for a non-blocking lock, or asks for a blocking lock that succeeds immediately. However we're going to want to always look up a block first in order to check whether we're revisiting a deferred lock call, and to be prepared to handle the case where the filesystem returns -EINPROGRESS--in that case we want to make sure the lock we've given the filesystem is the one embedded in the block that we'll use to track the deferred request. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-05-06lockd: handle test_lock deferralsMarc Eshel
Rewrite nlmsvc_testlock() to use the new asynchronous interface: instead of immediately doing a posix_test_lock(), we first look for a matching block. If the subsequent test_lock returns anything other than -EINPROGRESS, we then remove the block we've found and return the results. If it returns -EINPROGRESS, then we defer the lock request. In the case where the block we find in the first step has B_QUEUED set, we bypass the vfs_test_lock entirely, instead using the block to decide how to respond: with nlm_lck_denied if B_TIMED_OUT is set. with nlm_granted if B_GOT_CALLBACK is set. by dropping if neither B_TIMED_OUT nor B_GOT_CALLBACK is set Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-05-06lockd: pass cookie in nlmsvc_testlockMarc Eshel
Change NLM internal interface to pass more information for test lock; we need this to make sure the cookie information is pushed down to the place where we do request deferral, which is handled for testlock by the following patch. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-05-06lockd: handle fl_grant callbacksMarc Eshel
Add code to handle file system callback when the lock is finally granted. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-05-06lockd: save lock state on deferralMarc Eshel
We need to keep some state for a pending asynchronous lock request, so this patch adds that state to struct nlm_block. This also adds a function which defers the request, by calling rqstp->rq_chandle.defer and storing the resulting deferred request in a nlm_block structure which we insert into lockd's global block list. That new function isn't called yet, so it's dead code until a later patch. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-05-06locks: allow {vfs,posix}_lock_file to return conflicting lockMarc Eshel
The nfsv4 protocol's lock operation, in the case of a conflict, returns information about the conflicting lock. It's unclear how clients can use this, so for now we're not going so far as to add a filesystem method that can return a conflicting lock, but we may as well return something in the local case when it's easy to. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-05-06locks: give posix_test_lock same interface as ->lockMarc Eshel
posix_test_lock() and ->lock() do the same job but have gratuitously different interfaces. Modify posix_test_lock() so the two agree, simplifying some code in the process. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-02-03NLM: Fix double free in __nlm_async_callTrond Myklebust
rpc_call_async() will always call rpc_release_calldata(), so it is an error for __nlm_async_call() to do so as well. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-12-13[PATCH] lockd endianness annotationsAl Viro
Annotated, all places switched to keeping status net-endian. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-12-08[PATCH] struct path: convert lockdJosef Sipek
Signed-off-by: Josef Sipek <jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-20[PATCH] lockd endianness annotationsAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Acked-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-04[PATCH] Convert lockd to use the newer mutex instead of the older semaphoreNeil Brown
Both the (recently introduces) nsm_sema and the older f_sema are converted over. Cc: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-04[PATCH] knfsd: match GRANTED_RES replies using cookiesOlaf Kirch
When we send a GRANTED_MSG call, we current copy the NLM cookie provided in the original LOCK call - because in 1996, some broken clients seemed to rely on this bug. However, this means the cookies are not unique, so that when the client's GRANTED_RES message comes back, we cannot simply match it based on the cookie, but have to use the client's IP address in addition. Which breaks when you have a multi-homed NFS client. The X/Open spec explicitly mentions that clients should not expect the same cookie; so one may hope that any clients that were broken in 1996 have either been fixed or rendered obsolete. Signed-off-by: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-04[PATCH] knfsd: lockd: make nlm_traverse_* more flexibleOlaf Kirch
This patch makes nlm_traverse{locks,blocks,shares} and friends use a function pointer rather than a "action" enum. This function pointer is given two nlm_hosts (one given by the caller, the other taken from the lock/block/share currently visited), and is free to do with them as it wants. If it returns a non-zero value, the lockd/block/share is released. Signed-off-by: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-04[PATCH] knfsd: lockd: Change list of blocked list to list_nodeOlaf Kirch
This patch changes the nlm_blocked list to use a list_node instead of homegrown linked list handling. Signed-off-by: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-04[PATCH] knfsd: when looking up a lockd host, pass hostname & lengthOlaf Kirch
This patch adds the peer's hostname (and name length) to all calls to nlm*_lookup_host functions. A subsequent patch will make use of these (is requested by a sysctl). Signed-off-by: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-02[PATCH] namespaces: utsname: switch to using uts namespacesSerge E. Hallyn
Replace references to system_utsname to the per-process uts namespace where appropriate. This includes things like uname. Changes: Per Eric Biederman's comments, use the per-process uts namespace for ELF_PLATFORM, sunrpc, and parts of net/ipv4/ipconfig.c [jdike@addtoit.com: UML fix] [clg@fr.ibm.com: cleanup] [akpm@osdl.org: build fix] Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at> Cc: Andrey Savochkin <saw@sw.ru> Signed-off-by: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-08-03NLM/lockd: remove b_doneJ. Bruce Fields
We never actually set the b_done field any more; it's always zero. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> (cherry picked from af8412d4283ef91356e65e0ed9b025b376aebded commit)
2006-06-30Remove obsolete #include <linux/config.h>Jörn Engel
Signed-off-by: Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
2006-04-19NFS: make 2 functions staticAdrian Bunk
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20LOCKD: nlmsvc_traverse_blocks return is unusedJ. Bruce Fields
Note that we never return non-zero. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20lockd: blocks should hold a reference to the nlm_fileTrond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20lockd: Fix a typo in nlmsvc_grant_release()Trond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20NLM: Add nlmclnt_release_callTrond Myklebust
Add a helper function to simplify the freeing of NLM client requests. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20lockd: Make nlmsvc_create_block() use nlmsvc_lookup_host()Trond Myklebust
Currently it uses nlmclnt_lookup_host(), which puts the resulting host structure on a different list. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20lockd: Clean up of the server-side GRANTED codeTrond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20lockd: Add refcounting to struct nlm_blockTrond Myklebust
Otherwise, the block may disappear from underneath us when in nlmsvc_retry_blocked. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20lockd: Fix server-side lock blocking codeTrond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20lockd: Remove FL_LOCKD flagJ. Bruce Fields
Currently lockd identifies its own locks using the FL_LOCKD flag. This doesn't scale well to multiple lock managers--if we did this in nfsv4 too, for example, we'd be left with only one free flag bit. Instead, we just check whether the file manager ops (fl_lmops) set on this lock are our own. The only use for this is in nlm_traverse_locks, which uses it to find locks that need cleaning up when freeing a host or a file. In the long run it might be nice to do reference counting instead of traversing all the locks like this.... Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20locks,lockd: fix race in nlmsvc_testlockAndy Adamson
posix_test_lock() returns a pointer to a struct file_lock which is unprotected and can be removed while in use by the caller. Move the conflicting lock from the return to a parameter, and copy the conflicting lock. In most cases the caller ends up putting the copy of the conflicting lock on the stack. On i386, sizeof(struct file_lock) appears to be about 100 bytes. We're assuming that's reasonable. Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20lockd: make nlmsvc_lock use only posix_lock_fileAndy Adamson
Reorganize nlmsvc_lock() to make full use of posix_lock_file(), which does eveything nlmsvc_lock() needs - no need to call posix_test_lock(), posix_locks_deadlock(), or posix_block_lock() separately. Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20lockd: simplify nlmsvc_grant_blockedAndy Adamson
Reorganize nlmsvc_grant_blocked() to make full use of posix_lock_file(). Note that there's no need for separate calls to posix_test_lock(), posix_locks_deadlock(), or posix_block_lock(). Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20lockd: clean up nlmsvc_lockAndy Adamson
Slightly more consistent dprintk error reporting, consolidate some up()'s. Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20lockd: Don't expose the process pid to the NLM serverTrond Myklebust
Instead we use the nlm_lockowner->pid. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-01-06NLM: Further cancel fixesJ. Bruce Fields
If the server receives an NLM cancel call and finds no waiting lock to cancel, then chances are the lock has already been applied, and the client just hadn't yet processed the NLM granted callback before it sent the cancel. The Open Group text, for example, perimts a server to return either success (LCK_GRANTED) or failure (LCK_DENIED) in this case. But returning an error seems more helpful; the client may be able to use it to recognize that a race has occurred and to recover from the race. So, modify the relevant functions to return an error in this case. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-01-06NLM: clean up nlmsvc_delete_blockJ. Bruce Fields
The fl_next check here is superfluous (and possibly a layering violation). Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-01-06NLM: don't unlock on cancel requestsJ. Bruce Fields
Currently when lockd gets an NLM_CANCEL request, it also does an unlock for the same range. This is incorrect. The Open Group documentation says that "This procedure cancels an *outstanding* blocked lock request." (Emphasis mine.) Also, consider a client that holds a lock on the first byte of a file, and requests a lock on the entire file. If the client cancels that request (perhaps because the requesting process is signalled), the server shouldn't apply perform an unlock on the entire file, since that will also remove the previous lock that the client was already granted. Or consider a lock request that actually *downgraded* an exclusive lock to a shared lock. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>