aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/ufs/util.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2006-12-07[PATCH] fs: ufs add missing bracketMariusz Kozlowski
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-07-01[PATCH] ufs: truncate should allocate block for last byteEvgeniy Dushistov
This patch fixes buggy behaviour of UFS in such kind of scenario: open(, O_TRUNC...) ftruncate(, 1024) ftruncate(, 0) Such a scenario causes ufs_panic and remount read-only. This happen because of according to specification UFS should always allocate block for last byte, and many parts of our implementation rely on this, but `ufs_truncate' doesn't care about this. To make possible return error code and to know about old size, this patch removes `truncate' from ufs inode_operations and uses `setattr' method to call ufs_truncate. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25[PATCH] ufs: ubh_ll_rw_block cleanupEvgeniy Dushistov
In ufs code there is function: ubh_ll_rw_block, it has parameter how many ufs_buffer_head it should handle, but it always called with "1" on the place of this parameter. This patch removes unused parameter of "ubh_ll_wr_block". Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25[PATCH] ufs: make fsck -f happyEvgeniy Dushistov
ufs super block contains some statistic about file systems, like amount of directories, free blocks, inodes and so on. UFS1 hold this information in one location and uses 32bit integers for such information, UFS2 hold statistic in another location and uses 64bit integers. There is transition variant, if UFS1 has type 44BSD and flags field in super block has some special value this mean that we work with statistic like UFS2 does. and this also means that nobody care about old(UFS1) statistic. So if start fsck against such file system, after usage linux ufs driver, it found error: at now only UFS1 like statistic is updated. This patch should fix this. Also it contains some minor cleanup: CodingSytle and remove unused variables. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25[PATCH] ufs: one way to access super blockEvgeniy Dushistov
Super block of UFS usually has size >512, because of fragment size may be 512, this cause some problems. Currently, there are two methods to work with ufs super block: 1) split structure which describes ufs super blocks into structures with size <=512 2) use one structure which describes ufs super block, and hope that array of "buffer_head" which holds "super block", has such construction: bh[n]->b_data + bh[n]->b_size == bh[n + 1]->b_data The second variant may cause some problems in the future, and usage of two variants cause unnecessary code duplication. This patch remove the second variant. Also patch contains some CodingStyle fixes. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25[PATCH] ufs: not usual amounts of fragments per blockEvgeniy Dushistov
The writing to UFS file system with block/fragment!=8 may cause bogus behaviour. The problem in "ufs_bitmap_search" function, which doesn't work correctly in "block/fragment!=8" case. The idea is stolen from BSD code. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25[PATCH] ufs: wrong type castEvgeniy Dushistov
There are two ugly macros in ufs code: #define UCPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)ucpi) #define USPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)uspi) when uspi looks like struct { struct ufs_buffer_head ; } and USPI_UBH has some sence, ucpi looks like struct { struct not_ufs_buffer_head; } To prevent bugs in future, this patch convert macros to inline function and fix "ucpi" structure. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25[PATCH] ufs: ufs_trunc_indirect: infinite cycleEvgeniy Dushistov
Currently, ufs write support have two sets of problems: work with files and work with directories. This series of patches should solve the first problem. This patch is similar to http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/17/61 this patch complements it. The situation the same: in ufs_trunc_(not direct), we read block, check if count of links to it is equal to one, if so we finish cycle, if not continue. Because of "count of links" always >=2 this operation cause infinite cycle and hang up the kernel. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-14[PATCH] ufs cleanupEvgeniy
Here is update of ufs cleanup patch, brought on by the recently fixed ubh_get_usb_second() bug that made some ugly code rather painfully obvious. It also includes - fix compilation warnings which appears if debug mode turn on - remove unnecessary duplication of code to support UFS2 I tested it on ufs1 and ufs2 file-systems. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-13[PATCH] Fix oops in ufs_fill_super at mount timeEvgeniy
There's a lack of parenthesis in fs/ufs/utils.h, so instead of the 512th byte of buffer, the usb2 pointer will point to the nth structure of type ufs_super_block_second. This can cause a mount-time oops if you're unlucky (especially with DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, which is how Alexey Dobriyan saw this problem) Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Acked-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!