aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/asm-x86/e820_32.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2008-04-19x86: rename find_max_pfn() to propagate_e820_map()Ingo Molnar
this function doesnt just 'find' the max_pfn - it also has other side-effects such as registering sparse memory maps. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-17include/asm-x86/e820_32.h: checkpatch cleanups - formatting onlyJoe Perches
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-03-21x86: trim mtrr don't close gap for resource allocation.Yinghai Lu
fix the bug reported here: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10232 use update_memory_range() instead of add_memory_range() directly to avoid closing the gap. ( the new code only affects and runs on systems where the MTRR workaround triggers. ) Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-30x86_32: trim memory by updating e820Yinghai Lu
when MTRRs are not covering the whole e820 table, we need to trim the RAM and need to update e820. reuse some code on 64-bit as well. here need to add early_get_cap and use it in early_cpu_detect, and move mtrr_bp_init early. The code successfully trimmed the memory map on Justin's system: from: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 000000022c000000 (usable) to: [ 0.000000] modified: 0000000100000000 - 0000000228000000 (usable) [ 0.000000] modified: 0000000228000000 - 000000022c000000 (reserved) According to Justin it makes quite a difference: | When I boot the box without any trimming it acts like a 286 or 386, | takes about 10 minutes to boot (using raptor disks). Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com> Tested-by: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-30x86 boot: use E820 memory map on EFI 32 platformHuang, Ying
Because the EFI memory map are converted to e820 memory map in bootloader, the EFI memory map handling code is removed to clean up. Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-30x86: remove extern declarations for code, data, bss resourcesBernhard Walle
This patch removes the extern struct resource declarations for data_resource, code_resource and bss_resource on x86 and declares that three structures as static as done on other architectures like IA64. On i386, these structures are moved to setup_32.c (from e820_32.c) because that's code that is not specific to e820 and also required on EFI systems. That makes the "extern" reference superfluous. On x86_64, data_resource, code_resource and bss_resource are passed to e820_reserve_resources() as arguments just as done on i386 and IA64. That also avoids the "extern" reference and it's possible to make it static. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-23Make asm-x86/bootparam.h includable from userspace.Rusty Russell
To actually write a bootloader (or, say, the lguest launcher) currently requires duplication of these structures. Making them includable from userspace is much nicer. We merge the common userspace-required definitions of e820_32/64.h into e820.h for export. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2007-10-11i386/x86_64: move headers to include/asm-x86Thomas Gleixner
Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the header install make rules Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>