aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2008-04-17x86: spinlock ops are always-inlinedIngo Molnar
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-04-17include/asm-x86/spinlock.h: checkpatch cleanups - formatting onlyJoe Perches
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-30x86: big ticket locksNick Piggin
This implements ticket lock support for more than 255 CPUs on x86. The code gets switched according to the configured NR_CPUS. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-30x86: cleanup CLI_STRING, STI_STRING and friendsGlauber de Oliveira Costa
Since the advent of ticket locking, CLI_STRING, STI_STRING, and friends are not used anymore. They can now be safely deleted. Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-30x86: FIFO ticket spinlocksNick Piggin
Introduce ticket lock spinlocks for x86 which are FIFO. The implementation is described in the comments. The straight-line lock/unlock instruction sequence is slightly slower than the dec based locks on modern x86 CPUs, however the difference is quite small on Core2 and Opteron when working out of cache, and becomes almost insignificant even on P4 when the lock misses cache. trylock is more significantly slower, but they are relatively rare. On an 8 core (2 socket) Opteron, spinlock unfairness is extremely noticable, with a userspace test having a difference of up to 2x runtime per thread, and some threads are starved or "unfairly" granted the lock up to 1 000 000 (!) times. After this patch, all threads appear to finish at exactly the same time. The memory ordering of the lock does conform to x86 standards, and the implementation has been reviewed by Intel and AMD engineers. The algorithm also tells us how many CPUs are contending the lock, so lockbreak becomes trivial and we no longer have to waste 4 bytes per spinlock for it. After this, we can no longer spin on any locks with preempt enabled and cannot reenable interrupts when spinning on an irq safe lock, because at that point we have already taken a ticket and the would deadlock if the same CPU tries to take the lock again. These are questionable anyway: if the lock happens to be called under a preempt or interrupt disabled section, then it will just have the same latency problems. The real fix is to keep critical sections short, and ensure locks are reasonably fair (which this patch does). Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-30x86: merge spinlock.h variantsThomas Gleixner
Merge them finally together Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-30x86: consolidate spinlock.hGlauber de Oliveira Costa
The cli and sti instructions need to be replaced by paravirt hooks. For the i386 architecture, this is already done. The code requirements aren't much different from x86_64 POV, so this part is consolidated in the common header Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-11i386/x86_64: move headers to include/asm-x86Thomas Gleixner
Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the header install make rules Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>