| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
For the places where we need a pointer to the network header, it is still legal
to touch skb->nh.raw directly if just adding to, subtracting from or setting it
to another layer header.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
For consistency with all the other skb->nh.raw accessors.
Also do some really obvious simplifications in pppoe_recvmsg, well the
kfree_skb one is not so obvious, but free() and kfree() have the same behaviour
(hint :-) ).
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Otherwise we can potentially try to dereference a NULL device
pointer in some cases.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
And actually, with this, the whole pppox layer can basically
be removed and subsumed into pppoe.c, no other pppox sub-protocol
implementation exists and we've had this thing for at least 4
years.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
