aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/scsi/scsi_devinfo.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2006-04-14Merge ../scsi-rc-fixes-2.6James Bottomley
Conflicts: include/scsi/scsi_devinfo.h Same number for two BLIST flags: BLIST_MAX_512 and BLIST_ATTACH_PQ3 Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2006-04-14[SCSI] BLIST_ATTACH_PQ3 flagsKurt Garloff
Some devices report a peripheral qualifier of 3 for LUN 0; with the original code, we would still try a REPORT_LUNS scan (if SCSI level is >= 3 or if we have the BLIST_REPORTLUNS2 passed in), but NOT any sequential scan. Also, the device at LUN 0 (which is not connected according to the PQ) is not registered with the OS. Unfortunately, SANs exist that are SCSI-2 and do NOT support REPORT_LUNS, but report a unknown device with PQ 3 on LUN 0. We still need to scan them, and most probably we even need BLIST_SPARSELUN (and BLIST_LARGELUN). See the bug reference for an infamous example. This is patch 3/3: 3. Implement the blacklist flag BLIST_ATTACH_PQ3 that makes the scsi scanning code register PQ3 devices and continues scanning; only sg will attach thanks to scsi_bus_match(). Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2006-04-13[SCSI] add SCSI_UNKNOWN and LUN transfer limit restrictionsJames Bottomley
Original From: Ingo Flaschberger <if@xip.at> To support the RA4100 array from Compaq. This patch now correctly handles SCSI_UNKNOWN types with regard to BLIST_REPORTLUNS2 (allow it) and cdb[1] LUN inclusion (don't). It also allows a BLIST_MAX_512 flag to restrict the maximum transfer length to 512 blocks (apparently this is an RA4100 problem). Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!