aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/sched_fair.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2008-03-21sched: cleanup old and rarely used 'debug' features.Peter Zijlstra
TREE_AVG and APPROX_AVG are initial task placement policies that have been disabled for a long while.. time to remove them. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> CC: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-03-19sched: retune wake granularityIngo Molnar
reduce wake-up granularity for better interactivity. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-03-19sched: improve affine wakeupsIngo Molnar
improve affine wakeups. Maintain the 'overlap' metric based on CFS's sum_exec_runtime - which means the amount of time a task executes after it wakes up some other task. Use the 'overlap' for the wakeup decisions: if the 'overlap' is short, it means there's strong workload coupling between this task and the woken up task. If the 'overlap' is large then the workload is decoupled and the scheduler will move them to separate CPUs more easily. ( Also slightly move the preempt_check within try_to_wake_up() - this has no effect on functionality but allows 'early wakeups' (for still-on-rq tasks) to be correctly accounted as well.) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-03-19sched: clean up wakeup balancing, code flowIngo Molnar
Clean up the code flow. No code changed: kernel/sched.o: text data bss dec hex filename 42521 2858 232 45611 b22b sched.o.before 42521 2858 232 45611 b22b sched.o.after md5: 09b31c44e9aff8666f72773dc433e2df sched.o.before.asm 09b31c44e9aff8666f72773dc433e2df sched.o.after.asm Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-03-19sched: clean up wakeup balancing, rename variablesIngo Molnar
rename 'cpu' to 'prev_cpu'. No code changed: kernel/sched.o: text data bss dec hex filename 42521 2858 232 45611 b22b sched.o.before 42521 2858 232 45611 b22b sched.o.after md5: 09b31c44e9aff8666f72773dc433e2df sched.o.before.asm 09b31c44e9aff8666f72773dc433e2df sched.o.after.asm Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-03-19sched: clean up wakeup balancing, move wake_affine()Ingo Molnar
split out the affine-wakeup bits. No code changed: kernel/sched.o: text data bss dec hex filename 42521 2858 232 45611 b22b sched.o.before 42521 2858 232 45611 b22b sched.o.after md5: 9d76738f1272aa82f0b7affd2f51df6b sched.o.before.asm 09b31c44e9aff8666f72773dc433e2df sched.o.after.asm (the md5's changed because stack slots changed and some registers get scheduled by gcc in a different order - but otherwise the before and after assembly is instruction for instruction equivalent.) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-03-15sched: simplify sched_slice()Ingo Molnar
Use the existing calc_delta_mine() calculation for sched_slice(). This saves a divide and simplifies the code because we share it with the other /cfs_rq->load users. It also improves code size: text data bss dec hex filename 42659 2740 144 45543 b1e7 sched.o.before 42093 2740 144 44977 afb1 sched.o.after Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
2008-03-15sched: fix fair sleepersIngo Molnar
Fair sleepers need to scale their latency target down by runqueue weight. Otherwise busy systems will gain ever larger sleep bonus. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
2008-03-15sched: fix overload performance: buddy wakeupsPeter Zijlstra
Currently we schedule to the leftmost task in the runqueue. When the runtimes are very short because of some server/client ping-pong, especially in over-saturated workloads, this will cycle through all tasks trashing the cache. Reduce cache trashing by keeping dependent tasks together by running newly woken tasks first. However, by not running the leftmost task first we could starve tasks because the wakee can gain unlimited runtime. Therefore we only run the wakee if its within a small (wakeup_granularity) window of the leftmost task. This preserves fairness, but does alternate server/client task groups. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-03-15sched: min_vruntime fixPeter Zijlstra
Current min_vruntime tracking is incorrect and will cause serious problems when we don't run the leftmost task for some reason. min_vruntime does two things; 1) it's used to determine a forward direction when the u64 vruntime wraps, 2) it's used to track the leftmost vruntime to position newly enqueued tasks from. The current logic advances min_vruntime whenever the current task's vruntime advance. Because the current task may pass the leftmost task still waiting we're failing the second goal. This causes new tasks to be placed too far ahead and thus penalizes their runtime. Fix this by making min_vruntime the min_vruntime of the waiting tasks by tracking it in enqueue/dequeue, and compare against current's vruntime to obtain the absolute minimum when placing new tasks. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-03-07sched: retain vruntimePeter Zijlstra
Kei Tokunaga reported an interactivity problem when moving tasks between control groups. Tasks would retain their old vruntime when moved between groups, this can cause funny lags. Re-set the vruntime on group move to fit within the new tree. Reported-by: Kei Tokunaga <tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-03-04sched: revert load_balance_monitor() changesPeter Zijlstra
The following commits cause a number of regressions: commit 58e2d4ca581167c2a079f4ee02be2f0bc52e8729 Author: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri Jan 25 21:08:00 2008 +0100 sched: group scheduling, change how cpu load is calculated commit 6b2d7700266b9402e12824e11e0099ae6a4a6a79 Author: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri Jan 25 21:08:00 2008 +0100 sched: group scheduler, fix fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groups Namely: - very frequent wakeups on SMP, reported by PowerTop users. - cacheline trashing on (large) SMP - some latencies larger than 500ms While there is a mergeable patch to fix the latter, the former issues are not fixable in a manner suitable for .25 (we're at -rc3 now). Hence we revert them and try again in v2.6.26. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> CC: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Alexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-02-25sched: clean up __pick_last_entity() a bitIngo Molnar
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-02-25sched: remove duplicate code from sched_fair.cBalbir Singh
pick_task_entity() duplicates existing code. This functionality can be easily obtained using rb_last(). Avoid code duplication by using rb_last(). Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-31sched: let +nice tasks have smaller impactPeter Zijlstra
Michel Dänzr has bisected an interactivity problem with plus-reniced tasks back to this commit: 810e95ccd58d91369191aa4ecc9e6d4a10d8d0c8 is first bad commit commit 810e95ccd58d91369191aa4ecc9e6d4a10d8d0c8 Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Date: Mon Oct 15 17:00:14 2007 +0200 sched: another wakeup_granularity fix unit mis-match: wakeup_gran was used against a vruntime fix this by assymetrically scaling the vtime of positive reniced tasks. Bisected-by: Michel Dänzer <michel@tungstengraphics.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-31sched: fix high wake up latencies with FAIR_USER_SCHEDSrivatsa Vaddagiri
The reason why we are getting better wakeup latencies for !FAIR_USER_SCHED is because of this snippet of code in place_entity(): if (!initial) { /* sleeps upto a single latency don't count. */ if (sched_feat(NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS) && entity_is_task(se)) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ vruntime -= sysctl_sched_latency; /* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */ vruntime = max_vruntime(se->vruntime, vruntime); } NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS feature gives credit for sleeping only to tasks and not group-level entities. With the patch attached, I could see that wakeup latencies with FAIR_USER_SCHED are restored to the same level as !FAIR_USER_SCHED. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25sched: keep total / count stats in addition to the max forArjan van de Ven
Right now, the linux kernel (with scheduler statistics enabled) keeps track of the maximum time a process is waiting to be scheduled. While the maximum is a very useful metric, tracking average and total is equally useful (at least for latencytop) to figure out the accumulated effect of scheduler delays. The accumulated effect is important to judge the performance impact of scheduler tuning/behavior. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25sched: fix: don't take a mutex from interrupt contextPeter Zijlstra
print_cfs_stats is callable from interrupt context (sysrq), hence it should not take mutexes. Change it to use RCU since the task group data is RCU freed anyway. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25sched: latencytop supportArjan van de Ven
LatencyTOP kernel infrastructure; it measures latencies in the scheduler and tracks it system wide and per process. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25sched: high-res preemption tickPeter Zijlstra
Use HR-timers (when available) to deliver an accurate preemption tick. The regular scheduler tick that runs at 1/HZ can be too coarse when nice level are used. The fairness system will still keep the cpu utilisation 'fair' by then delaying the task that got an excessive amount of CPU time but try to minimize this by delivering preemption points spot-on. The average frequency of this extra interrupt is sched_latency / nr_latency. Which need not be higher than 1/HZ, its just that the distribution within the sched_latency period is important. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25sched: RT-balance, add new methods to sched_classSteven Rostedt
Dmitry Adamushko found that the current implementation of the RT balancing code left out changes to the sched_setscheduler and rt_mutex_setprio. This patch addresses this issue by adding methods to the schedule classes to handle being switched out of (switched_from) and being switched into (switched_to) a sched_class. Also a method for changing of priorities is also added (prio_changed). This patch also removes some duplicate logic between rt_mutex_setprio and sched_setscheduler. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25sched: remove do_div() from __sched_slice()Peter Zijlstra
Yanmin Zhang noticed a nice optimization: p = l * nr / nl, nl = l/g -> p = g * nr which eliminates a do_div() from __sched_period(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25sched: no need for 'affine wakeup' balancingDmitry Adamushko
No need to do a check for 'affine wakeup and passive balancing possibilities' in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu. I guess, this part got missed upon introduction of per-sched_class select_task_rq() in try_to_wake_up(). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25sched: de-SCHED_OTHER-ize the RT pathGregory Haskins
The current wake-up code path tries to determine if it can optimize the wake-up to "this_cpu" by computing load calculations. The problem is that these calculations are only relevant to SCHED_OTHER tasks where load is king. For RT tasks, priority is king. So the load calculation is completely wasted bandwidth. Therefore, we create a new sched_class interface to help with pre-wakeup routing decisions and move the load calculation as a function of CFS task's class. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25sched: group scheduler, fix fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groupsSrivatsa Vaddagiri
The current load balancing scheme isn't good enough for precise group fairness. For example: on a 8-cpu system, I created 3 groups as under: a = 8 tasks (cpu.shares = 1024) b = 4 tasks (cpu.shares = 1024) c = 3 tasks (cpu.shares = 1024) a, b and c are task groups that have equal weight. We would expect each of the groups to receive 33.33% of cpu bandwidth under a fair scheduler. This is what I get with the latest scheduler git tree: Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Col1 | Col2 | Col3 | Col4 ------|---------|-------|------------------------------------------------------- a | 277.676 | 57.8% | 54.1% 54.1% 54.1% 54.2% 56.7% 62.2% 62.8% 64.5% b | 116.108 | 24.2% | 47.4% 48.1% 48.7% 49.3% c | 86.326 | 18.0% | 47.5% 47.9% 48.5% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Explanation of o/p: Col1 -> Group name Col2 -> Cumulative execution time (in seconds) received by all tasks of that group in a 60sec window across 8 cpus Col3 -> CPU bandwidth received by the group in the 60sec window, expressed in percentage. Col3 data is derived as: Col3 = 100 * Col2 / (NR_CPUS * 60) Col4 -> CPU bandwidth received by each individual task of the group. Col4 = 100 * cpu_time_recd_by_task / 60 [I can share the test case that produces a similar o/p if reqd] The deviation from desired group fairness is as below: a = +24.47% b = -9.13% c = -15.33% which is quite high. After the patch below is applied, here are the results: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Col1 | Col2 | Col3 | Col4 ------|---------|-------|------------------------------------------------------- a | 163.112 | 34.0% | 33.2% 33.4% 33.5% 33.5% 33.7% 34.4% 34.8% 35.3% b | 156.220 | 32.5% | 63.3% 64.5% 66.1% 66.5% c | 160.653 | 33.5% | 85.8% 90.6% 91.4% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deviation from desired group fairness is as below: a = +0.67% b = -0.83% c = +0.17% which is far better IMO. Most of other runs have yielded a deviation within +-2% at the most, which is good. Why do we see bad (group) fairness with current scheuler? ========================================================= Currently cpu's weight is just the summation of individual task weights. This can yield incorrect results. For ex: consider three groups as below on a 2-cpu system: CPU0 CPU1 --------------------------- A (10) B(5) C(5) --------------------------- Group A has 10 tasks, all on CPU0, Group B and C have 5 tasks each all of which are on CPU1. Each task has the same weight (NICE_0_LOAD = 1024). The current scheme would yield a cpu weight of 10240 (10*1024) for each cpu and the load balancer will think both CPUs are perfectly balanced and won't move around any tasks. This, however, would yield this bandwidth: A = 50% B = 25% C = 25% which is not the desired result. What's changing in the patch? ============================= - How cpu weights are calculated when CONFIF_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED is defined (see below) - API Change - Two tunables introduced in sysfs (under SCHED_DEBUG) to control the frequency at which the load balance monitor thread runs. The basic change made in this patch is how cpu weight (rq->load.weight) is calculated. Its now calculated as the summation of group weights on a cpu, rather than summation of task weights. Weight exerted by a group on a cpu is dependent on the shares allocated to it and also the number of tasks the group has on that cpu compared to the total number of (runnable) tasks the group has in the system. Let, W(K,i) = Weight of group K on cpu i T(K,i) = Task load present in group K's cfs_rq on cpu i T(K) = Total task load of group K across various cpus S(K) = Shares allocated to group K NRCPUS = Number of online cpus in the scheduler domain to which group K is assigned. Then, W(K,i) = S(K) * NRCPUS * T(K,i) / T(K) A load balance monitor thread is created at bootup, which periodically runs and adjusts group's weight on each cpu. To avoid its overhead, two min/max tunables are introduced (under SCHED_DEBUG) to control the rate at which it runs. Fixes from: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> - don't start the load_balance_monitor when there is only a single cpu. - rename the kthread because its currently longer than TASK_COMM_LEN Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25sched: group scheduling, change how cpu load is calculatedSrivatsa Vaddagiri
This patch changes how the cpu load exerted by fair_sched_class tasks is calculated. Load exerted by fair_sched_class tasks on a cpu is now a summation of the group weights, rather than summation of task weights. Weight exerted by a group on a cpu is dependent on the shares allocated to it. This version of patch has a minor impact on code size, but should have no runtime/functional impact for !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED. Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25sched: group scheduling, minor fixesSrivatsa Vaddagiri
Minor bug fixes for the group scheduler: - Use a mutex to serialize add/remove of task groups and also when changing shares of a task group. Use the same mutex when printing cfs_rq debugging stats for various task groups. - Use list_for_each_entry_rcu in for_each_leaf_cfs_rq macro (when walking task group list) Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-12-18sched: do not hurt SCHED_BATCH on wakeupIngo Molnar
measurements by Yanmin Zhang have shown that SCHED_BATCH tasks benefit if they run the same place_entity() logic as SCHED_OTHER tasks - so uniformize behavior in this area. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-12-04sched: default to more agressive yield for SCHED_BATCH tasksIngo Molnar
do more agressive yield for SCHED_BATCH tuned tasks: they are all about throughput anyway. This allows a gentler migration path for any apps that relied on stronger yield. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-12-02sched: cpu accounting controller (V2)Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Commit cfb5285660aad4931b2ebbfa902ea48a37dfffa1 removed a useful feature for us, which provided a cpu accounting resource controller. This feature would be useful if someone wants to group tasks only for accounting purpose and doesnt really want to exercise any control over their cpu consumption. The patch below reintroduces the feature. It is based on Paul Menage's original patch (Commit 62d0df64065e7c135d0002f069444fbdfc64768f), with these differences: - Removed load average information. I felt it needs more thought (esp to deal with SMP and virtualized platforms) and can be added for 2.6.25 after more discussions. - Convert group cpu usage to be nanosecond accurate (as rest of the cfs stats are) and invoke cpuacct_charge() from the respective scheduler classes - Make accounting scalable on SMP systems by splitting the usage counter to be per-cpu - Move the code from kernel/cpu_acct.c to kernel/sched.c (since the code is not big enough to warrant a new file and also this rightly needs to live inside the scheduler. Also things like accessing rq->lock while reading cpu usage becomes easier if the code lived in kernel/sched.c) The patch also modifies the cpu controller not to provide the same accounting information. Tested-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested the patches on top of 2.6.24-rc3. The patches work fine. Ran some simple tests like cpuspin (spin on the cpu), ran several tasks in the same group and timed them. Compared their time stamps with cpuacct.usage. Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-11-26sched: fix minimum granularity tuningsZou Nan hai
increase the default minimum granularity some more - this gives us more performance in aim7 benchmarks. also correct some comments: we scale with ilog(ncpus) + 1. Signed-off-by: Zou Nan hai <nanhai.zou@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-11-15sched: make sched_nr_latency staticAdrian Bunk
sched_nr_latency can now become static. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-11-09sched: fix copy_namespace() <-> sched_fork() dependency in do_forkSrivatsa Vaddagiri
Sukadev Bhattiprolu reported a kernel crash with control groups. There are couple of problems discovered by Suka's test: - The test requires the cgroup filesystem to be mounted with atleast the cpu and ns options (i.e both namespace and cpu controllers are active in the same hierarchy). # mkdir /dev/cpuctl # mount -t cgroup -ocpu,ns none cpuctl (or simply) # mount -t cgroup none cpuctl -> Will activate all controllers in same hierarchy. - The test invokes clone() with CLONE_NEWNS set. This causes a a new child to be created, also a new group (do_fork->copy_namespaces->ns_cgroup_clone-> cgroup_clone) and the child is attached to the new group (cgroup_clone-> attach_task->sched_move_task). At this point in time, the child's scheduler related fields are uninitialized (including its on_rq field, which it has inherited from parent). As a result sched_move_task thinks its on runqueue, when it isn't. As a solution to this problem, I moved sched_fork() call, which initializes scheduler related fields on a new task, before copy_namespaces(). I am not sure though whether moving up will cause other side-effects. Do you see any issue? - The second problem exposed by this test is that task_new_fair() assumes that parent and child will be part of the same group (which needn't be as this test shows). As a result, cfs_rq->curr can be NULL for the child. The solution is to test for curr pointer being NULL in task_new_fair(). With the patch below, I could run ns_exec() fine w/o a crash. Reported-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-11-09sched: clean up the wakeup preempt check, #2Ingo Molnar
clean up the preemption check to not use unnecessary 64-bit variables. This improves code size: text data bss dec hex filename 44227 3326 36 47589 b9e5 sched.o.before 44201 3326 36 47563 b9cb sched.o.after Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-11-09sched: clean up the wakeup preempt checkIngo Molnar
clean up the wakeup preemption check. No code changed: text data bss dec hex filename 44227 3326 36 47589 b9e5 sched.o.before 44227 3326 36 47589 b9e5 sched.o.after Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-11-09sched: wakeup preemption fixIngo Molnar
wakeup preemption fix: do not make it dependent on p->prio. Preemption purely depends on ->vruntime. This improves preemption in mixed-nice-level workloads. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-11-09sched: remove PREEMPT_RESTRICTIngo Molnar
remove PREEMPT_RESTRICT. (this is a separate commit so that any regression related to the removal itself is bisectable) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-11-09sched: reintroduce SMP tunings againIngo Molnar
Yanmin Zhang reported an aim7 regression and bisected it down to: | commit 38ad464d410dadceda1563f36bdb0be7fe4c8938 | Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | Date: Mon Oct 15 17:00:02 2007 +0200 | | sched: uniform tunings | | use the same defaults on both UP and SMP. fix this by reintroducing similar SMP tunings again. This resolves the regression. (also update the comments to match the ilog2(nr_cpus) tuning effect) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-11-09sched: reintroduce the sched_min_granularity tunablePeter Zijlstra
we lost the sched_min_granularity tunable to a clever optimization that uses the sched_latency/min_granularity ratio - but the ratio is quite unintuitive to users and can also crash the kernel if the ratio is set to 0. So reintroduce the min_granularity tunable, while keeping the ratio maintained internally. no functionality changed. [ mingo@elte.hu: some fixlets. ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-11-09sched: documentation: place_entity() commentsPeter Zijlstra
Add a few comments to place_entity(). No code changed. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-11-09sched: fix vslicePeter Zijlstra
vslice was missing a factor NICE_0_LOAD, as weight is in weight*NICE_0_LOAD units. the effect of this bug was larger initial slices and thus latency-noisier forks. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-10-29sched: fix style of swap() macro in kernel/sched_fair.cIngo Molnar
fix style of swap() macro in kernel/sched_fair.c. ( this macro should eventually move to a general header, as ext3 uses a similar construct too. ) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-10-24sched: isolate SMP balancing code a bit morePeter Williams
At the moment, a lot of load balancing code that is irrelevant to non SMP systems gets included during non SMP builds. This patch addresses this issue and reduces the binary size on non SMP systems: text data bss dec hex filename 10983 28 1192 12203 2fab sched.o.before 10739 28 1192 11959 2eb7 sched.o.after Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-10-24sched: reduce balance-tasks overheadPeter Williams
At the moment, balance_tasks() provides low level functionality for both move_tasks() and move_one_task() (indirectly) via the load_balance() function (in the sched_class interface) which also provides dual functionality. This dual functionality complicates the interfaces and internal mechanisms and makes the run time overhead of operations that are called with two run queue locks held. This patch addresses this issue and reduces the overhead of these operations. Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-10-17sched: fix new task startup crashSrivatsa Vaddagiri
Child task may be added on a different cpu that the one on which parent is running. In which case, task_new_fair() should check whether the new born task's parent entity should be added as well on the cfs_rq. Patch below fixes the problem in task_new_fair. This could fix the put_prev_task_fair() crashes reported. Reported-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-10-15sched: reintroduce cache-hot affinityIngo Molnar
reintroduce a simplified version of cache-hot/cold scheduling affinity. This improves performance with certain SMP workloads, such as sysbench. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-10-15sched: speed up context-switches a bitIngo Molnar
speed up context-switches a bit by not clearing p->exec_start. (as a side-effect, this also makes p->exec_start a universal timestamp available to cache-hot estimations.) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-10-15sched: do not wakeup-preempt with SCHED_BATCH tasksIngo Molnar
do not wakeup-preempt with SCHED_BATCH tasks, their preemption is batched too, driven by the tick. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-10-15sched: update commentIngo Molnar
update comment: clarify time-slices and remove obsolete tuning detail. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-10-15sched: prevent wakeup over-schedulingMike Galbraith
Prevent wakeup over-scheduling. Once a task has been preempted by a task of the same or lower priority, it becomes ineligible for repeated preemption by same until it has been ticked, or slept. Instead, the task is marked for preemption at the next tick. Tasks of higher priority still preempt immediately. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>