aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2008-01-28[TCP]: Move !in_sack test earlier in sacktag & reorganize if()sIlpo Järvinen
All intermediate conditions include it already, make them simpler as well. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-12-29[TCP]: use non-delayed ACK for congestion control RTTGavin McCullagh
When a delayed ACK representing two packets arrives, there are two RTT samples available, one for each packet. The first (in order of seq number) will be artificially long due to the delay waiting for the second packet, the second will trigger the ACK and so will not itself be delayed. According to rfc1323, the SRTT used for RTO calculation should use the first rtt, so receivers echo the timestamp from the first packet in the delayed ack. For congestion control however, it seems measuring delayed ack delay is not desirable as it varies independently of congestion. The patch below causes seq_rtt and last_ackt to be updated with any available later packet rtts which should have less (and hopefully zero) delack delay. The rtt value then gets passed to ca_ops->pkts_acked(). Where TCP_CONG_RTT_STAMP was set, effort was made to supress RTTs from within a TSO chunk (!fully_acked), using only the final ACK (which includes any TSO delay) to generate RTTs. This patch removes these checks so RTTs are passed for each ACK to ca_ops->pkts_acked(). For non-delay based congestion control (cubic, h-tcp), rtt is sometimes used for rtt-scaling. In shortening the RTT, this may make them a little less aggressive. Delay-based schemes (eg vegas, veno, illinois) should get a cleaner, more accurate congestion signal, particularly for small cwnds. The congestion control module can potentially also filter out bad RTTs due to the delayed ack alarm by looking at the associated cnt which (where delayed acking is in use) should probably be 1 if the alarm went off or greater if the ACK was triggered by a packet. Signed-off-by: Gavin McCullagh <gavin.mccullagh@nuim.ie> Acked-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-12-16[IPV4]: Make tcp_input_metrics() get minimum RTO via tcp_rto_min()Satoru SATOH
tcp_input_metrics() refers to the built-time constant TCP_RTO_MIN regardless of configured minimum RTO with iproute2. Signed-off-by: Satoru SATOH <satoru.satoh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-12-05[TCP]: Move prior_in_flight collect to more robust placeIlpo Järvinen
The previous location is after sacktag processing, which affects counters tcp_packets_in_flight depends on. This may manifest as wrong behavior if new SACK blocks are present and all is clear for call to tcp_cong_avoid, which in the case of tcp_reno_cong_avoid bails out early because it thinks that TCP is not limited by cwnd. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-12-05[TCP] FRTO: Use of existing funcs make code more obvious & robustIlpo Järvinen
Though there's little need for everything that tcp_may_send_now does (actually, even the state had to be adjusted to pass some checks FRTO does not want to occur), it's more robust to let it make the decision if sending is allowed. State adjustments needed: - Make sure snd_cwnd limit is not hit in there - Disable nagle (if necessary) through the frto_counter == 2 The result of check for frto_counter in argument to call for tcp_enter_frto_loss can just be open coded, therefore there isn't need to store the previous frto_counter past tcp_may_send_now. In addition, returns can then be combined. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-11-14[TCP] FRTO: Clear frto_highmark only after process_frto that uses itIlpo Järvinen
I broke this in commit 3de96471bd7fb76406e975ef6387abe3a0698149: [TCP]: Wrap-safed reordering detection FRTO check tcp_process_frto should always see a valid frto_highmark. An invalid frto_highmark (zero) is very likely what ultimately caused a seqno compare in tcp_frto_enter_loss to do the wrong leading to the LOST-bit leak. Having LOST-bits integry ensured like done after commit 23aeeec365dcf8bc87fae44c533e50d0bb4f23cc: [TCP] FRTO: Plug potential LOST-bit leak won't hurt. It may still be useful in some other, possibly legimate, scenario. Reported by Chazarain Guillaume <guichaz@yahoo.fr>. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-11-14[TCP]: Make sure write_queue_from does not begin with NULL ptrIlpo Järvinen
NULL ptr can be returned from tcp_write_queue_head to cached_skb and then assigned to skb if packets_out was zero. Without this, system is vulnerable to a carefully crafted ACKs which obviously is remotely triggerable. Besides, there's very little that needs to be done in sacktag if there weren't any packets outstanding, just skipping the rest doesn't hurt. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-11-13[TCP] FRTO: Plug potential LOST-bit leakIlpo Järvinen
It might be possible that, in some extreme scenario that I just cannot now construct in my mind, end_seq <= frto_highmark check does not match causing the lost_out and LOST bits become out-of-sync due to clearing and recounting in the loop. This may fix LOST-bit leak reported by Chazarain Guillaume <guichaz@yahoo.fr>. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-11-13[TCP] FRTO: Limit snd_cwnd if TCP was application limitedIlpo Järvinen
Otherwise TCP might violate packet ordering principles that FRTO is based on. If conventional recovery path is chosen, this won't be significant at all. In practice, any small enough value will be sufficient to provide proper operation for FRTO, yet other users of snd_cwnd might benefit from a "close enough" value. FRTO's formula is now equal to what tcp_enter_cwr() uses. FRTO used to check application limitedness a bit differently but I changed that in commit 575ee7140dabe9b9c4f66f4f867039b97e548867 and as a result checking for application limitedness became completely non-existing. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-11-10[TCP]: Split SACK FRTO flag clearing (fixes FRTO corner case bug)Ilpo Järvinen
In case we run out of mem when fragmenting, the clearing of FLAG_ONLY_ORIG_SACKED might get missed which then feeds FRTO with false information. Move clearing outside skb processing loop so that it will get executed even if the skb loop terminates prematurely due to out-of-mem. Besides, now the core of the loop truly deals with a single skb only, which also enables creation a more self-contained of tcp_sacktag_one later on. In addition, small reorganization of if branches was made. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-11-10[TCP]: Add unlikely() to sacktag out-of-mem in fragment caseIlpo Järvinen
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-11-10[TCP]: Fix reord detection due to snd_una covered holesIlpo Järvinen
Fixes subtle bug like the one with fastpath_cnt_hint happening due to the way the GSO and hints interact. Because hints are not reset when just a GSOed skb is partially ACKed, there's no guarantee that the relevant part of the write queue is going to be processed in sacktag at all (skbs below snd_una) because fastpath hint can fast forward the entrypoint. This was also on the way of future reductions in sacktag's skb processing. Also future cleanups in sacktag can be made after this (in 2.6.25). This may make reordering update in tcp_try_undo_partial redundant but I'm not too sure so I left it there. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-11-10[TCP]: Consider GSO while counting reord in sacktagIlpo Järvinen
Reordering detection fails to take account that the reordered skb may have pcount larger than 1. In such case the lowest of them had the largest reordering, the old formula used the highest of them which is pcount - 1 packets less reordered. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-11-01[TCP]: Another TAGBITS -> SACKED_ACKED|LOST conversionIlpo Järvinen
Similar to commit 3eec0047d9bdd, point of this is to avoid skipping R-bit skbs. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-11-01[TCP]: Process DSACKs that reside within a SACK blockIlpo Järvinen
DSACK inside another SACK block were missed if start_seq of DSACK was larger than SACK block's because sorting prioritizes full processing of the SACK block before DSACK. After SACK block sorting situation is like this: SSSSSSSSS D SSSSSS SSSSSSS Because write_queue is walked in-order, when the first SACK block has been processed, TCP is already past the skb for which the DSACK arrived and we haven't taught it to backtrack (nor should we), so TCP just continues processing by going to the next SACK block after the DSACK (if any). Whenever such DSACK is present, do an embedded checking during the previous SACK block. If the DSACK is below snd_una, there won't be overlapping SACK block, and thus no problem in that case. Also if start_seq of the DSACK is equal to the actual block, it will be processed first. Tested this by using netem to duplicate 15% of packets, and by printing SACK block when found_dup_sack is true and the selected skb in the dup_sack = 1 branch (if taken): SACK block 0: 4344-5792 (relative to snd_una 2019137317) SACK block 1: 4344-5792 (relative to snd_una 2019137317) equal start seqnos => next_dup = 0, dup_sack = 1 won't occur... SACK block 0: 5792-7240 (relative to snd_una 2019214061) SACK block 1: 2896-7240 (relative to snd_una 2019214061) DSACK skb match 5792-7240 (relative to snd_una) ...and next_dup = 1 case (after the not shown start_seq sort), went to dup_sack = 1 branch. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-26[TCP]: fix D-SACK cwnd handlingRyousei Takano
In the current net-2.6 kernel, handling FLAG_DSACKING_ACK is broken. The flag is cleared to 1 just after FLAG_DSACKING_ACK is set. if (found_dup_sack) flag |= FLAG_DSACKING_ACK; : flag = 1; To fix it, this patch introduces a part of the tcp_sacktag_state patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=119210560431519&w=2 Signed-off-by: Ryousei Takano <takano-ryousei@aist.go.jp> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-26[TCP]: Make tcp_match_skb_to_sack() static.Adrian Bunk
tcp_match_skb_to_sack() can become static. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-25[TCP]: Fix inconsistency of terms.Ryousei Takano
Fix inconsistency of terms: 1) D-SACK 2) F-RTO Signed-off-by: Ryousei Takano <takano-ryousei@aist.go.jp> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-23[NET]: Treat the sign of the result of skb_headroom() consistentlyChuck Lever
In some places, the result of skb_headroom() is compared to an unsigned integer, and in others, the result is compared to a signed integer. Make the comparisons consistent and correct. Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-18[TCP]: Remove lost_retrans zero seqno special casesIlpo Järvinen
Both high-sack detection and new lowest seq variables have unnecessary zero special case which are now removed by setting safe initial seqnos. This also fixes problem which caused zero received_upto being passed to tcp_mark_lost_retrans which confused after relations within the marker loop causing incorrect TCPCB_SACKED_RETRANS clearing. The problem was noticed because of a performance report from TAKANO Ryousei <takano@axe-inc.co.jp>. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Acked-by: Ryousei Takano <takano-ryousei@aist.go.jp> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15[TCP]: high_seq parameter removed (all callers use tp->high_seq)Ilpo Järvinen
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-11[TCP]: Limit processing lost_retrans loop to work-to-do casesIlpo Järvinen
This addition of lost_retrans_low to tcp_sock might be unnecessary, it's not clear how often lost_retrans worker is executed when there wasn't work to do. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-11[TCP]: Fix lost_retrans loop vs fastpath problemsIlpo Järvinen
Detection implemented with lost_retrans must work also when fastpath is taken, yet most of the queue is skipped including (very likely) those retransmitted skb's we're interested in. This problem appeared when the hints got added, which removed a need to always walk over the whole write queue head. Therefore decicion for the lost_retrans worker loop entry must be separated from the sacktag processing more than it was necessary before. It turns out to be problematic to optimize the worker loop very heavily because ack_seqs of skb may have a number of discontinuity points. Maybe similar approach as currently is implemented could be attempted but that's becoming more and more complex because the trend is towards less skb walking in sacktag marker. Trying a simple work until all rexmitted skbs heve been processed approach. Maybe after(highest_sack_end_seq, tp->high_seq) checking is not sufficiently accurate and causes entry too often in no-work-to-do cases. Since that's not known, I've separated solution to that from this patch. Noticed because of report against a related problem from TAKANO Ryousei <takano@axe-inc.co.jp>. He also provided a patch to that part of the problem. This patch includes solution to it (though this patch has to use somewhat different placement). TAKANO's description and patch is available here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=119149311913288&w=2 ...In short, TAKANO's problem is that end_seq the loop is using not necessarily the largest SACK block's end_seq because the current ACK may still have higher SACK blocks which are later by the loop. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-11[TCP]: No need to re-count fackets_out/sacked_out at RTOIlpo Järvinen
Both sacked_out and fackets_out are directly known from how parameter. Since fackets_out is accurate, there's no need for recounting (sacked_out was previously unnecessarily counted in the loop anyway). Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-11[TCP]: Extract tcp_match_queue_to_sack from sacktag codeIlpo Järvinen
This is necessary for upcoming DSACK bugfix. Reduces sacktag length which is not very sad thing at all... :-) Notice that there's a need to handle out-of-mem at caller's place. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-11[TCP]: Kill almost unused variable pcount from sacktagIlpo Järvinen
It's on the way for future cutting of that function. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-11[TCP]: Fix mark_head_lost to ignore R-bit when trying to mark LIlpo Järvinen
This condition (plain R) can arise at least in recovery that is triggered after tcp_undo_loss. There isn't any reason why they should not be marked as lost, not marking makes in_flight estimator to return too large values. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-11[TCP]: Add bytes_acked (ABC) clearing to FRTO tooIlpo Järvinen
I was reading tcp_enter_loss while looking for Cedric's bug and noticed bytes_acked adjustment is missing from FRTO side. Since bytes_acked will only be used in tcp_cong_avoid, I think it's safe to assume RTO would be spurious. During FRTO cwnd will be not controlled by tcp_cong_avoid and if FRTO calls for conventional recovery, cwnd is adjusted and the result of wrong assumption is cleared from bytes_acked. If RTO was in fact spurious, we did normal ABC already and can continue without any additional adjustments. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Separate lost_retrans loop into own functionIlpo Järvinen
Follows own function for each task principle, this is really somewhat separate task being done in sacktag. Also reduces indentation. In addition, added ack_seq local var to break some long lines & fixed coding style things. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[NET]: sparse warning fixesStephen Hemminger
Fix a bunch of sparse warnings. Mostly about 0 used as NULL pointer, and shadowed variable declarations. One notable case was that hash size should have been unsigned. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: "Annotate" another fackets_out state resetIlpo Järvinen
This should no longer be necessary because fackets_out is accurate. It indicates bugs elsewhere, thus report it. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Wrap-safed reordering detection FRTO checkIlpo Järvinen
In case somebody has a suggestion about a better place for this check, which must guarantee execution "early enough" (i.e, before the wrap can occur), I'm very open to them. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Update comment of SACK block validatorIlpo Järvinen
Just came across what RFC2018 states about generation of valid SACK blocks in case of reneging. Alter comment a bit to point out clearly. IMHO, there isn't any reason to change code because the validation is there for a purpose (counters will inform user about decision TCP made if this case ever surfaces). Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: fix comments that got messed up during code moveIlpo Järvinen
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP] MIB: Count FRTO's successfully detected spurious RTOsIlpo Järvinen
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Reordered ACK's (old) SACKs not included to discarded MIBIlpo Järvinen
In case of ACK reordering, the SACK block might be valid in it's time but is already obsoleted since we've received another kind of confirmation about arrival of the segments through snd_una advancement of an earlier packet. I didn't bother to build distinguishing of valid and invalid SACK blocks but simply made reordered SACK blocks that are too old always not counted regardless of their "real" validity which could be determined by using the ack field of the reordered packet (won't be significant IMHO). DSACKs can very well be considered useful even in this situation, so won't do any of this for them. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Avoid clearing sacktag hint in trivial situationsIlpo Järvinen
There's no reason to clear the sacktag skb hint when small part of the rexmit queue changes. Account changes (if any) instead when fragmenting/collapsing. RTO/FRTO do not touch SACKED_ACKED bits so no need to discard SACK tag hint at all. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Enable SACK enhanced FRTO (RFC4138) by defaultIlpo Järvinen
Most of the description that follows comes from my mail to netdev (some editing done): Main obstacle to FRTO use is its deployment as it has to be on the sender side where as wireless link is often the receiver's access link. Take initiative on behalf of unlucky receivers and enable it by default in future Linux TCP senders. Also IETF seems to interested in advancing FRTO from experimental [1]. How does FRTO help? =================== FRTO detects spurious RTOs and avoids a number of unnecessary retransmissions and a couple of other problems that can arise due to incorrect guess made at RTO (i.e., that segments were lost when they actually got delayed which is likely to occur e.g. in wireless environments with link-layer retransmission). Though FRTO cannot prevent the first (potentially unnecessary) retransmission at RTO, I suspect that it won't cost that much even if you have to pay for each bit (won't be that high percentage out of all packets after all :-)). However, usually when you have a spurious RTO, not only the first segment unnecessarily retransmitted but the *whole window*. It goes like this: all cumulative ACKs got delayed due to in-order delivery, then TCP will actually send 1.5*original cwnd worth of data in the RTO's slow-start when the delayed ACKs arrive (basically the original cwnd worth of it unnecessarily). In case one is interested in minimizing unnecessary retransmissions e.g. due to cost, those rexmissions must never see daylight. Besides, in the worst case the generated burst overloads the bottleneck buffers which is likely to significantly delay the further progress of the flow. In case of ll rexmissions, ACK compression often occurs at the same time making the burst very "sharp edged" (in that case TCP often loses most of the segments above high_seq => very bad performance too). When FRTO is enabled, those unnecessary retransmissions are fully avoided except for the first segment and the cwnd behavior after detected spurious RTO is determined by the response (one can tune that by sysctl). Basic version (non-SACK enhanced one), FRTO can fail to detect spurious RTO as spurious and falls back to conservative behavior. ACK lossage is much less significant than reordering, usually the FRTO can detect spurious RTO if at least 2 cumulative ACKs from original window are preserved (excluding the ACK that advances to high_seq). With SACK-enhanced version, the detection is quite robust. FRTO should remove the need to set a high lower bound for the RTO estimator due to delay spikes that occur relatively common in some environments (esp. in wireless/cellular ones). [1] http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg02862.html Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP] FRTO: Improve interoperability with other undo_marker usersIlpo Järvinen
Basically this change enables it, previously other undo_marker users were left with nothing. Reverse undo_marker logic completely to get it set right in CA_Loss. On the other hand, when spurious RTO is detected, clear it. Clearing might be too heavy for some scenarios but seems safe enough starting point for now and shouldn't have much effect except in majority of cases (if in any). By adding a new FLAG_ we avoid looping through write_queue when RTO occurs. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Cleanup tcp_tso_acked and tcp_clean_rtx_queueIlpo Järvinen
Implements following cleanups: - Comment re-placement (CodingStyle) - tcp_tso_acked() local (wrapper-like) variable removal (readability) - __-types removed (IMHO they make local variables jumpy looking and just was space) - acked -> flag (naming conventions elsewhere in TCP code) - linebreak adjustments (readability) - nested if()s combined (reduced indentation) - clarifying newlines added Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Move accounting from tso_acked to clean_rtx_queueIlpo Järvinen
The accounting code is pretty much the same, so it's a shame we do it in two places. I'm not too sure if added fully_acked check in MTU probing is really what we want perhaps the added end_seq could be used in the after() comparison. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: clear_all_retrans_hints prefixed by tcp_Ilpo Järvinen
In addition, fix its function comment spacing. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Make fackets_out accurateIlpo Järvinen
Substraction for fackets_out is unconditional when snd_una advances, thus there's no need to do it inside the loop. Just make sure correct bounds are honored. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP] MIB: Add counters for discarded SACK blocksIlpo Järvinen
In DSACK case, some events are not extraordinary, such as packet duplication generated DSACK. They can arrive easily below snd_una when undo_marker is not set (TCP being in CA_Open), counting such DSACKs amoung SACK discards will likely just mislead if they occur in some scenario when there are other problems as well. Similarly, excessively delayed packets could cause "normal" DSACKs. Therefore, separate counters are allocated for DSACK events. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Discard fuzzy SACK blocksIlpo Järvinen
SACK processing code has been a sort of russian roulette as no validation of SACK blocks is previously attempted. Besides, it is not very clear what all kinds of broken SACK blocks really mean (e.g., one that has start and end sequence numbers reversed). So now close the roulette once and for all. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Rename tcp_ack_packets_out -> tcp_rearm_rtoIlpo Järvinen
Only thing that tiny function does is rearming the RTO (if necessary), name it accordingly. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Remove unnecessary wrapper tcp_packets_out_decIlpo Järvinen
Makes caller side more obvious, there's no need to have a wrapper for this oneliner! Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Move sack_ok access to obviously named funcs & cleanupIlpo Järvinen
Previously code had IsReno/IsFack defined as macros that were local to tcp_input.c though sack_ok field has user elsewhere too for the same purpose. This changes them to static inlines as preferred according the current coding style and unifies the access to sack_ok across multiple files. Magic bitops of sack_ok for FACK and DSACK are also abstracted to functions with appropriate names. Note: - One sack_ok = 1 remains but that's self explanary, i.e., it enables sack - Couple of !IsReno cases are changed to tcp_is_sack - There were no users for IsDSack => I dropped it Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Reduce sacked_out with reno when purging write_queueIlpo Järvinen
Previously TCP had a transitional state during which reno counted segments that are already below the current window into sacked_out, which is now prevented. In addition, re-try now the unconditional S+L skb catching. This approach conservatively calls just remove_sack and leaves reset_sack() calls alone. The best solution to the whole problem would be to first calculate the new sacked_out fully (this patch does not move reno_sack_reset calls from original sites and thus does not implement this). However, that would require very invasive change to fastretrans_alert (perhaps even slicing it to two halves). Alternatively, all callers of tcp_packets_in_flight (i.e., users that depend on sacked_out) should be postponed until the new sacked_out has been calculated but it isn't any simpler alternative. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[TCP]: Keep state in Disorder also if only lost_out > 0Ilpo Järvinen
This happens rather infrequently and is only possible during FRTO. We must not allow TCP to slip to Open state because tcp_fastretrans_alert might then not be called on it's time when FRTO has exited. This become a problem when left_out got removed and was replaced by just sacked_out. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>