From 44e08c45cc14e6190a424be8d450070c8e508fad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Chinner Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 02:39:40 +0000 Subject: xfs: Don't flush stale inodes Because inodes remain in cache much longer than inode buffers do under memory pressure, we can get the situation where we have stale, dirty inodes being reclaimed but the backing storage has been freed. Hence we should never, ever flush XFS_ISTALE inodes to disk as there is no guarantee that the backing buffer is in cache and still marked stale when the flush occurs. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Signed-off-by: Alex Elder --- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c index ce278b3ae7f..391d36b0e68 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c @@ -2841,10 +2841,14 @@ xfs_iflush( mp = ip->i_mount; /* - * If the inode isn't dirty, then just release the inode - * flush lock and do nothing. + * If the inode isn't dirty, then just release the inode flush lock and + * do nothing. Treat stale inodes the same; we cannot rely on the + * backing buffer remaining stale in cache for the remaining life of + * the stale inode and so xfs_itobp() below may give us a buffer that + * no longer contains inodes below. Doing this stale check here also + * avoids forcing the log on pinned, stale inodes. */ - if (xfs_inode_clean(ip)) { + if (xfs_inode_clean(ip) || xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_ISTALE)) { xfs_ifunlock(ip); return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3