From a1cf076ba93f9fdf3eb4195f9f43d1e7cb7550f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel Becker Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:45:49 -0800 Subject: ocfs2: __ocfs2_mark_extent_written() doesn't need struct inode. We only allow unwritten extents on data, so the toplevel ocfs2_mark_extent_written() can use an inode all it wants. But the subfunction isn't even using the inode argument. Signed-off-by: Joel Becker --- fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c index 7b0f2cd9f66..4488685a702 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c @@ -5026,9 +5026,8 @@ out: * have been brought into cache (and pinned via the journal), so the * extra overhead is not expressed in terms of disk reads. */ -static int __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(struct inode *inode, +static int __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(handle_t *handle, struct ocfs2_extent_tree *et, - handle_t *handle, struct ocfs2_path *path, int split_index, struct ocfs2_extent_rec *split_rec, @@ -5062,7 +5061,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(struct inode *inode, /* * The core merge / split code wants to know how much room is - * left in this inodes allocation tree, so we pass the + * left in this allocation tree, so we pass the * rightmost extent list. */ if (path->p_tree_depth) { @@ -5185,7 +5184,7 @@ int ocfs2_mark_extent_written(struct inode *inode, split_rec.e_flags = path_leaf_el(left_path)->l_recs[index].e_flags; split_rec.e_flags &= ~OCFS2_EXT_UNWRITTEN; - ret = __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(inode, et, handle, left_path, + ret = __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(handle, et, left_path, index, &split_rec, meta_ac, dealloc); if (ret) -- cgit v1.2.3