From 48ffc70b675aa7798a52a2e92e20f6cce9140b3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alok N Kataria Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:33:55 -0800 Subject: x86, vmi: TSC going backwards check in vmi clocksource Impact: fix time warps under vmware Similar to the check for TSC going backwards in the TSC clocksource, we also need this check for VMI clocksource. Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria Cc: Zachary Amsden Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Cc: stable@kernel.org --- arch/x86/kernel/vmiclock_32.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vmiclock_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vmiclock_32.c index c4c1f9e0940..bde106cae0a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmiclock_32.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmiclock_32.c @@ -283,10 +283,13 @@ void __devinit vmi_time_ap_init(void) #endif /** vmi clocksource */ +static struct clocksource clocksource_vmi; static cycle_t read_real_cycles(void) { - return vmi_timer_ops.get_cycle_counter(VMI_CYCLES_REAL); + cycle_t ret = (cycle_t)vmi_timer_ops.get_cycle_counter(VMI_CYCLES_REAL); + return ret >= clocksource_vmi.cycle_last ? + ret : clocksource_vmi.cycle_last; } static struct clocksource clocksource_vmi = { -- cgit v1.2.3 From 07a66d7c53a538e1a9759954a82bb6c07365eff9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ingo Molnar Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:04:13 +0100 Subject: x86: use the right protections for split-up pagetables Steven Rostedt found a bug in where in his modified kernel ftrace was unable to modify the kernel text, due to the PMD itself having been marked read-only as well in split_large_page(). The fix, suggested by Linus, is to not try to 'clone' the reference protection of a huge-page, but to use the standard (and permissive) page protection bits of KERNPG_TABLE. The 'cloning' makes sense for the ptes but it's a confused and incorrect concept at the page table level - because the pagetable entry is a set of all ptes and hence cannot 'clone' any single protection attribute - the ptes can be any mixture of protections. With the permissive KERNPG_TABLE, even if the pte protections get changed after this point (due to ftrace doing code-patching or other similar activities like kprobes), the resulting combined protections will still be correct and the pte's restrictive (or permissive) protections will control it. Also update the comment. This bug was there for a long time but has not caused visible problems before as it needs a rather large read-only area to trigger. Steve possibly hacked his kernel with some really large arrays or so. Anyway, the bug is definitely worth fixing. [ Huang Ying also experienced problems in this area when writing the EFI code, but the real bug in split_large_page() was not realized back then. ] Reported-by: Steven Rostedt Reported-by: Huang Ying Acked-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 15 +++++---------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c index 8ca0d8566fc..7be47d1a97e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c @@ -508,18 +508,13 @@ static int split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address) #endif /* - * Install the new, split up pagetable. Important details here: + * Install the new, split up pagetable. * - * On Intel the NX bit of all levels must be cleared to make a - * page executable. See section 4.13.2 of Intel 64 and IA-32 - * Architectures Software Developer's Manual). - * - * Mark the entry present. The current mapping might be - * set to not present, which we preserved above. + * We use the standard kernel pagetable protections for the new + * pagetable protections, the actual ptes set above control the + * primary protection behavior: */ - ref_prot = pte_pgprot(pte_mkexec(pte_clrhuge(*kpte))); - pgprot_val(ref_prot) |= _PAGE_PRESENT; - __set_pmd_pte(kpte, address, mk_pte(base, ref_prot)); + __set_pmd_pte(kpte, address, mk_pte(base, __pgprot(_KERNPG_TABLE))); base = NULL; out_unlock: -- cgit v1.2.3