From d21c95c569c462da20d491b75d0a45bd70ddc1bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Corbet Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:40:30 -0600 Subject: Add "no BKL needed" comments to several drivers This documents the fact that somebody looked at the relevant open() functions and concluded that, due to their trivial nature, no locking was needed. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/eeprom.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/cris/arch-v10') diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/eeprom.c b/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/eeprom.c index f1cac9dc75b..40c6fe4c06f 100644 --- a/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/eeprom.c +++ b/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/eeprom.c @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ int __init eeprom_init(void) } /* Opens the device. */ - +/* BKL not needed: no global resources accessed */ static int eeprom_open(struct inode * inode, struct file * file) { -- cgit v1.2.3