From 64d206d896ff70b828138577d5ff39deda5f1c4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ingo Molnar Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:26:59 +0200 Subject: x86: rename CONFIG_NONPROMISC_DEVMEM to CONFIG_PROMISC_DEVMEM Linus observed: > The real bug is that we shouldn't have "double negatives", and > certainly not negative config options. Making that "promiscuous > /dev/mem" option a negated thing as a config option was bad. right ... lets rename this option. There should never be a negation in config options. [ that reminds me of CONFIG_SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER, but that is for another commit ;-) ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/mm/pat.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/mm/pat.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c index d4585077977..c34dc483839 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c @@ -373,8 +373,8 @@ pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn, return vma_prot; } -#ifdef CONFIG_NONPROMISC_DEVMEM -/* This check is done in drivers/char/mem.c in case of NONPROMISC_DEVMEM*/ +#ifndef CONFIG_PROMISC_DEVMEM +/* This check is done in drivers/char/mem.c in case of !PROMISC_DEVMEM*/ static inline int range_is_allowed(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size) { return 1; @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static inline int range_is_allowed(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size) } return 1; } -#endif /* CONFIG_NONPROMISC_DEVMEM */ +#endif /* CONFIG_PROMISC_DEVMEM */ int phys_mem_access_prot_allowed(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size, pgprot_t *vma_prot) -- cgit v1.2.3