From 0dc36888d4422140f9eaf50f24953ec109f750a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:34:43 -0500 Subject: libata: rename ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* to ATAPI_PROT_* ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are ugly and naming schemes between ATA_PROT_* and ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are inconsistent causing confusion. Rename them to ATAPI_PROT_* and make them consistent with ATA counterpart. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/libata-sff.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata/libata-sff.c') diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c index fd5fe4e7e75..edeb4bea586 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ void ata_bmdma_drive_eh(struct ata_port *ap, ata_prereset_fn_t prereset, ap->hsm_task_state = HSM_ST_IDLE; if (qc && (qc->tf.protocol == ATA_PROT_DMA || - qc->tf.protocol == ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA)) { + qc->tf.protocol == ATAPI_PROT_DMA)) { u8 host_stat; host_stat = ap->ops->bmdma_status(ap); -- cgit v1.2.3