From bf6263a853c9c143bf03f0a6fdcc68ab714fb5f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Garzik Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:16:50 -0400 Subject: [libata] Use ATA_UDMAx standard masks when filling driver's udma_mask info The ATA_UDMAx masks are self-documenting, and far better than manually writing in the hex mask. Note that pata_it8213 mask differed from the comment. Added a FIXME there. Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/pata_hpt366.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata/pata_hpt366.c') diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_hpt366.c b/drivers/ata/pata_hpt366.c index 7a6ff3dfc77..6f7d34ad19e 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/pata_hpt366.c +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_hpt366.c @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static int hpt36x_init_one(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id) .flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS, .pio_mask = 0x1f, .mwdma_mask = 0x07, - .udma_mask = 0x1f, + .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA4, .port_ops = &hpt366_port_ops }; struct ata_port_info info = info_hpt366; -- cgit v1.2.3