From bf6263a853c9c143bf03f0a6fdcc68ab714fb5f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Garzik Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:16:50 -0400 Subject: [libata] Use ATA_UDMAx standard masks when filling driver's udma_mask info The ATA_UDMAx masks are self-documenting, and far better than manually writing in the hex mask. Note that pata_it8213 mask differed from the comment. Added a FIXME there. Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c') diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c b/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c index 2c0bc3bb169..0231aba51ca 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c @@ -495,14 +495,14 @@ static int serverworks_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id .flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS, .pio_mask = 0x1f, .mwdma_mask = 0x07, - .udma_mask = 0x1f, + .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA4, .port_ops = &serverworks_csb_port_ops }, { /* CSB5 - later revisions*/ .sht = &serverworks_sht, .flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS, .pio_mask = 0x1f, .mwdma_mask = 0x07, - .udma_mask = 0x3f, + .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA5, .port_ops = &serverworks_csb_port_ops } }; -- cgit v1.2.3