From bf6263a853c9c143bf03f0a6fdcc68ab714fb5f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Garzik Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:16:50 -0400 Subject: [libata] Use ATA_UDMAx standard masks when filling driver's udma_mask info The ATA_UDMAx masks are self-documenting, and far better than manually writing in the hex mask. Note that pata_it8213 mask differed from the comment. Added a FIXME there. Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/sata_svw.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata/sata_svw.c') diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_svw.c b/drivers/ata/sata_svw.c index 4fd4f107187..63fe99afd59 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/sata_svw.c +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_svw.c @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static const struct ata_port_info k2_port_info[] = { ATA_FLAG_MMIO | K2_FLAG_NO_ATAPI_DMA, .pio_mask = 0x1f, .mwdma_mask = 0x07, - .udma_mask = 0x7f, + .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA6, .port_ops = &k2_sata_ops, }, /* board_svw8 */ @@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ static const struct ata_port_info k2_port_info[] = { K2_FLAG_SATA_8_PORTS, .pio_mask = 0x1f, .mwdma_mask = 0x07, - .udma_mask = 0x7f, + .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA6, .port_ops = &k2_sata_ops, }, }; -- cgit v1.2.3