From 49a2c2b6f311666686744215c2a67442f0ed6550 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andy Green Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:11:07 +0000 Subject: fix-glamofb-remove-soft-delays.patch The delay versions of the access to registers were based on a misunderstanding of the Glamo docs: it can force nWAIT differently depending on the access type. Therefore we don't need to take special care about delays on CPU side. Signed-off-by: Andy Green --- drivers/mfd/glamo/glamo-core.h | 10 ---------- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/mfd/glamo/glamo-core.h') diff --git a/drivers/mfd/glamo/glamo-core.h b/drivers/mfd/glamo/glamo-core.h index 4c52bc44eaf..58aa72ec6bc 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/glamo/glamo-core.h +++ b/drivers/mfd/glamo/glamo-core.h @@ -80,16 +80,6 @@ struct glamo_mci_pdata { }; - -static inline void glamo_reg_access_delay(void) -{ - int n; - - for (n = 0; n != 2; n++) - nop(); -} - - int glamo_engine_enable(struct glamo_core *glamo, enum glamo_engine engine); int glamo_engine_disable(struct glamo_core *glamo, enum glamo_engine engine); void glamo_engine_reset(struct glamo_core *glamo, enum glamo_engine engine); -- cgit v1.2.3