From 05ad709d04799125ed85dd816fdb558258102172 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Cox Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:58:10 +0100 Subject: parport: quickfix the proc registration bug Ideally we should have a directory of drivers and a link to the 'active' driver. For now just show the first device which is effectively the existing semantics without a warning. This is an update on the original buggy patch that I then forgot to resubmit. Confusingly it was proposed by Red Hat, written by Etched Pixels fixed and submitted by Intel ... Resolves-Bug: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9749 Signed-off-by: Alan Cox Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- drivers/parport/share.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/parport') diff --git a/drivers/parport/share.c b/drivers/parport/share.c index 0ebca450ed2..dffa5d4fb29 100644 --- a/drivers/parport/share.c +++ b/drivers/parport/share.c @@ -614,7 +614,10 @@ parport_register_device(struct parport *port, const char *name, * pardevice fields. -arca */ port->ops->init_state(tmp, tmp->state); - parport_device_proc_register(tmp); + if (!test_and_set_bit(PARPORT_DEVPROC_REGISTERED, &port->devflags)) { + port->proc_device = tmp; + parport_device_proc_register(tmp); + } return tmp; out_free_all: @@ -646,10 +649,14 @@ void parport_unregister_device(struct pardevice *dev) } #endif - parport_device_proc_unregister(dev); - port = dev->port->physport; + if (port->proc_device == dev) { + port->proc_device = NULL; + clear_bit(PARPORT_DEVPROC_REGISTERED, &port->devflags); + parport_device_proc_unregister(dev); + } + if (port->cad == dev) { printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: %s forgot to release port\n", port->name, dev->name); -- cgit v1.2.3