From a2db8dfce8d94fecae50128d912fec7980687a51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Brownell Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:35:08 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] rtc framewok: rtc_wkalrm.enabled reporting updates Fix a glitch in the procfs dumping of whether the alarm IRQ is enabled: use the traditional name (from drivers/char/rtc.c and many other places) of "alarm_IRQ", not "alrm_wakeup" (which didn't even match the efirtc code, which originated that reporting API). Also, update a few of the RTC drivers to stop providing that duplicate status, and/or to expose it properly when reporting the alarm state. We really don't want every RTC driver doing their own thing here... Signed-off-by: David Brownell Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c') diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c index 5c8addcaf1f..4f654c901c6 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c @@ -137,6 +137,9 @@ static int at91_rtc_readalarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm) tm->tm_yday = rtc_year_days(tm->tm_mday, tm->tm_mon, tm->tm_year); tm->tm_year = at91_alarm_year - 1900; + alrm->enabled = (at91_sys_read(AT91_RTC_IMR) & AT91_RTC_ALARM) + ? 1 : 0; + pr_debug("%s(): %4d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", __FUNCTION__, 1900 + tm->tm_year, tm->tm_mon, tm->tm_mday, tm->tm_hour, tm->tm_min, tm->tm_sec); @@ -223,8 +226,6 @@ static int at91_rtc_proc(struct device *dev, struct seq_file *seq) { unsigned long imr = at91_sys_read(AT91_RTC_IMR); - seq_printf(seq, "alarm_IRQ\t: %s\n", - (imr & AT91_RTC_ALARM) ? "yes" : "no"); seq_printf(seq, "update_IRQ\t: %s\n", (imr & AT91_RTC_ACKUPD) ? "yes" : "no"); seq_printf(seq, "periodic_IRQ\t: %s\n", -- cgit v1.2.3