From 0496e02d8791e7f06673a19a181be30dad6eff70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Layton Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:39:16 -0500 Subject: cifs: turn smb_send into a wrapper around smb_sendv cifs: turn smb_send into a wrapper around smb_sendv Rename smb_send2 to smb_sendv to make it consistent with kernel naming conventions for functions that take a vector. There's no need to have 2 functions to handle sending SMB calls. Turn smb_send into a wrapper around smb_sendv. This also allows us to properly mark the socket as needing to be reconnected when there's a partial send from smb_send. Also, in practice we always use the address and noblocksnd flag that's attached to the TCP_Server_Info. There's no need to pass them in as separate args to smb_sendv. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp Signed-off-by: Steve French --- fs/cifs/transport.c | 107 ++++++++++------------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/cifs/transport.c') diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c index 7ebe6599ed3..2c7efd26992 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/transport.c +++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c @@ -154,81 +154,8 @@ void DeleteTconOplockQEntries(struct cifsTconInfo *tcon) spin_unlock(&GlobalMid_Lock); } -int -smb_send(struct socket *ssocket, struct smb_hdr *smb_buffer, - unsigned int smb_buf_length, struct sockaddr *sin, bool noblocksnd) -{ - int rc = 0; - int i = 0; - struct msghdr smb_msg; - struct kvec iov; - unsigned len = smb_buf_length + 4; - - if (ssocket == NULL) - return -ENOTSOCK; /* BB eventually add reconnect code here */ - iov.iov_base = smb_buffer; - iov.iov_len = len; - - smb_msg.msg_name = sin; - smb_msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(struct sockaddr); - smb_msg.msg_control = NULL; - smb_msg.msg_controllen = 0; - if (noblocksnd) - smb_msg.msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT + MSG_NOSIGNAL; - else - smb_msg.msg_flags = MSG_NOSIGNAL; - - /* smb header is converted in header_assemble. bcc and rest of SMB word - area, and byte area if necessary, is converted to littleendian in - cifssmb.c and RFC1001 len is converted to bigendian in smb_send - Flags2 is converted in SendReceive */ - - smb_buffer->smb_buf_length = cpu_to_be32(smb_buffer->smb_buf_length); - cFYI(1, ("Sending smb of length %d", smb_buf_length)); - dump_smb(smb_buffer, len); - - while (len > 0) { - rc = kernel_sendmsg(ssocket, &smb_msg, &iov, 1, len); - if ((rc == -ENOSPC) || (rc == -EAGAIN)) { - i++; - /* smaller timeout here than send2 since smaller size */ - /* Although it may not be required, this also is smaller - oplock break time */ - if (i > 12) { - cERROR(1, - ("sends on sock %p stuck for 7 seconds", - ssocket)); - rc = -EAGAIN; - break; - } - msleep(1 << i); - continue; - } - if (rc < 0) - break; - else - i = 0; /* reset i after each successful send */ - iov.iov_base += rc; - iov.iov_len -= rc; - len -= rc; - } - - if (rc < 0) { - cERROR(1, ("Error %d sending data on socket to server", rc)); - } else { - rc = 0; - } - - /* Don't want to modify the buffer as a - side effect of this call. */ - smb_buffer->smb_buf_length = smb_buf_length; - - return rc; -} - static int -smb_send2(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct kvec *iov, int n_vec, - struct sockaddr *sin, bool noblocksnd) +smb_sendv(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct kvec *iov, int n_vec) { int rc = 0; int i = 0; @@ -243,11 +170,11 @@ smb_send2(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct kvec *iov, int n_vec, if (ssocket == NULL) return -ENOTSOCK; /* BB eventually add reconnect code here */ - smb_msg.msg_name = sin; + smb_msg.msg_name = (struct sockaddr *) &server->addr.sockAddr; smb_msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(struct sockaddr); smb_msg.msg_control = NULL; smb_msg.msg_controllen = 0; - if (noblocksnd) + if (server->noblocksnd) smb_msg.msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT + MSG_NOSIGNAL; else smb_msg.msg_flags = MSG_NOSIGNAL; @@ -339,6 +266,18 @@ smb_send2(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct kvec *iov, int n_vec, return rc; } +int +smb_send(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct smb_hdr *smb_buffer, + unsigned int smb_buf_length) +{ + struct kvec iov; + + iov.iov_base = smb_buffer; + iov.iov_len = smb_buf_length + 4; + + return smb_sendv(server, &iov, 1); +} + static int wait_for_free_request(struct cifsSesInfo *ses, const int long_op) { if (long_op == CIFS_ASYNC_OP) { @@ -540,9 +479,7 @@ SendReceive2(const unsigned int xid, struct cifsSesInfo *ses, #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_STATS2 atomic_inc(&ses->server->inSend); #endif - rc = smb_send2(ses->server, iov, n_vec, - (struct sockaddr *) &(ses->server->addr.sockAddr), - ses->server->noblocksnd); + rc = smb_sendv(ses->server, iov, n_vec); #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_STATS2 atomic_dec(&ses->server->inSend); midQ->when_sent = jiffies; @@ -736,9 +673,7 @@ SendReceive(const unsigned int xid, struct cifsSesInfo *ses, #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_STATS2 atomic_inc(&ses->server->inSend); #endif - rc = smb_send(ses->server->ssocket, in_buf, in_buf->smb_buf_length, - (struct sockaddr *) &(ses->server->addr.sockAddr), - ses->server->noblocksnd); + rc = smb_send(ses->server, in_buf, in_buf->smb_buf_length); #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_STATS2 atomic_dec(&ses->server->inSend); midQ->when_sent = jiffies; @@ -879,9 +814,7 @@ send_nt_cancel(struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, struct smb_hdr *in_buf, mutex_unlock(&ses->server->srv_mutex); return rc; } - rc = smb_send(ses->server->ssocket, in_buf, in_buf->smb_buf_length, - (struct sockaddr *) &(ses->server->addr.sockAddr), - ses->server->noblocksnd); + rc = smb_send(ses->server, in_buf, in_buf->smb_buf_length); mutex_unlock(&ses->server->srv_mutex); return rc; } @@ -973,9 +906,7 @@ SendReceiveBlockingLock(const unsigned int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_STATS2 atomic_inc(&ses->server->inSend); #endif - rc = smb_send(ses->server->ssocket, in_buf, in_buf->smb_buf_length, - (struct sockaddr *) &(ses->server->addr.sockAddr), - ses->server->noblocksnd); + rc = smb_send(ses->server, in_buf, in_buf->smb_buf_length); #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_STATS2 atomic_dec(&ses->server->inSend); midQ->when_sent = jiffies; -- cgit v1.2.3 From da505c386c9f993e43861791dae339b2219cf8dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve French Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:49:35 +0000 Subject: [CIFS] Make socket retry timeouts consistent between blocking and nonblocking cases We have used approximately 15 second timeouts on nonblocking sends in the past, and also 15 second SMB timeout (waiting for server responses, for most request types). Now that we can do blocking tcp sends, make blocking send timeout approximately the same (15 seconds). Signed-off-by: Steve French --- fs/cifs/transport.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/cifs/transport.c') diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c index 2c7efd26992..0ad3e2d116a 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/transport.c +++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c @@ -199,7 +199,25 @@ smb_sendv(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct kvec *iov, int n_vec) n_vec - first_vec, total_len); if ((rc == -ENOSPC) || (rc == -EAGAIN)) { i++; - if (i >= 14) { + /* if blocking send we try 3 times, since each can block + for 5 seconds. For nonblocking we have to try more + but wait increasing amounts of time allowing time for + socket to clear. The overall time we wait in either + case to send on the socket is about 15 seconds. + Similarly we wait for 15 seconds for + a response from the server in SendReceive[2] + for the server to send a response back for + most types of requests (except SMB Write + past end of file which can be slow, and + blocking lock operations). NFS waits slightly longer + than CIFS, but this can make it take longer for + nonresponsive servers to be detected and 15 seconds + is more than enough time for modern networks to + send a packet. In most cases if we fail to send + after the retries we will kill the socket and + reconnect which may clear the network problem. + */ + if ((i >= 14) || (!server->noblocksnd && (i > 2))) { cERROR(1, ("sends on sock %p stuck for 15 seconds", ssocket)); -- cgit v1.2.3