From c49c31115067bc7c9a51ffdc735a515151dfa3eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Knutsson Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:27:12 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fs/ntfs: Conversion to generic boolean Conversion of booleans to: generic-boolean.patch (2006-08-23) Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson Signed-off-by: Anton Altaparmakov Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/ntfs/mft.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/ntfs/mft.c') diff --git a/fs/ntfs/mft.c b/fs/ntfs/mft.c index 584260fd684..2ad5c8b104b 100644 --- a/fs/ntfs/mft.c +++ b/fs/ntfs/mft.c @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ MFT_RECORD *map_extent_mft_record(ntfs_inode *base_ni, MFT_REF mref, int i; unsigned long mft_no = MREF(mref); u16 seq_no = MSEQNO(mref); - BOOL destroy_ni = FALSE; + bool destroy_ni = false; ntfs_debug("Mapping extent mft record 0x%lx (base mft record 0x%lx).", mft_no, base_ni->mft_no); @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ map_err_out: if (seq_no && (le16_to_cpu(m->sequence_number) != seq_no)) { ntfs_error(base_ni->vol->sb, "Found stale extent mft " "reference! Corrupt filesystem. Run chkdsk."); - destroy_ni = TRUE; + destroy_ni = true; m = ERR_PTR(-EIO); goto unm_err_out; } @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ map_err_out: if (unlikely(!tmp)) { ntfs_error(base_ni->vol->sb, "Failed to allocate " "internal buffer."); - destroy_ni = TRUE; + destroy_ni = true; m = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); goto unm_err_out; } @@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ err_out: * caller is responsible for unlocking the ntfs inode and unpinning the base * vfs inode. * - * Return TRUE if the mft record may be written out and FALSE if not. + * Return 'true' if the mft record may be written out and 'false' if not. * * The caller has locked the page and cleared the uptodate flag on it which * means that we can safely write out any dirty mft records that do not have @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ err_out: * Here is a description of the tests we perform: * * If the inode is found in icache we know the mft record must be a base mft - * record. If it is dirty, we do not write it and return FALSE as the vfs + * record. If it is dirty, we do not write it and return 'false' as the vfs * inode write paths will result in the access times being updated which would * cause the base mft record to be redirtied and written out again. (We know * the access time update will modify the base mft record because Windows @@ -877,11 +877,11 @@ err_out: * * If the inode is in icache and not dirty, we attempt to lock the mft record * and if we find the lock was already taken, it is not safe to write the mft - * record and we return FALSE. + * record and we return 'false'. * * If we manage to obtain the lock we have exclusive access to the mft record, * which also allows us safe writeout of the mft record. We then set - * @locked_ni to the locked ntfs inode and return TRUE. + * @locked_ni to the locked ntfs inode and return 'true'. * * Note we cannot just lock the mft record and sleep while waiting for the lock * because this would deadlock due to lock reversal (normally the mft record is @@ -891,24 +891,24 @@ err_out: * If the inode is not in icache we need to perform further checks. * * If the mft record is not a FILE record or it is a base mft record, we can - * safely write it and return TRUE. + * safely write it and return 'true'. * * We now know the mft record is an extent mft record. We check if the inode * corresponding to its base mft record is in icache and obtain a reference to - * it if it is. If it is not, we can safely write it and return TRUE. + * it if it is. If it is not, we can safely write it and return 'true'. * * We now have the base inode for the extent mft record. We check if it has an * ntfs inode for the extent mft record attached and if not it is safe to write - * the extent mft record and we return TRUE. + * the extent mft record and we return 'true'. * * The ntfs inode for the extent mft record is attached to the base inode so we * attempt to lock the extent mft record and if we find the lock was already - * taken, it is not safe to write the extent mft record and we return FALSE. + * taken, it is not safe to write the extent mft record and we return 'false'. * * If we manage to obtain the lock we have exclusive access to the extent mft * record, which also allows us safe writeout of the extent mft record. We * set the ntfs inode of the extent mft record clean and then set @locked_ni to - * the now locked ntfs inode and return TRUE. + * the now locked ntfs inode and return 'true'. * * Note, the reason for actually writing dirty mft records here and not just * relying on the vfs inode dirty code paths is that we can have mft records @@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ err_out: * appear if the mft record is reused for a new inode before it got written * out. */ -BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, +bool ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, const MFT_RECORD *m, ntfs_inode **locked_ni) { struct super_block *sb = vol->sb; @@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, mft_no); atomic_dec(&ni->count); iput(vi); - return FALSE; + return false; } ntfs_debug("Inode 0x%lx is not dirty.", mft_no); /* The inode is not dirty, try to take the mft record lock. */ @@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, "not write it.", mft_no); atomic_dec(&ni->count); iput(vi); - return FALSE; + return false; } ntfs_debug("Managed to lock mft record 0x%lx, write it.", mft_no); @@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, * return the locked ntfs inode. */ *locked_ni = ni; - return TRUE; + return true; } ntfs_debug("Inode 0x%lx is not in icache.", mft_no); /* The inode is not in icache. */ @@ -1003,13 +1003,13 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, if (!ntfs_is_mft_record(m->magic)) { ntfs_debug("Mft record 0x%lx is not a FILE record, write it.", mft_no); - return TRUE; + return true; } /* Write the mft record if it is a base inode. */ if (!m->base_mft_record) { ntfs_debug("Mft record 0x%lx is a base record, write it.", mft_no); - return TRUE; + return true; } /* * This is an extent mft record. Check if the inode corresponding to @@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, */ ntfs_debug("Base inode 0x%lx is not in icache, write the " "extent record.", na.mft_no); - return TRUE; + return true; } ntfs_debug("Base inode 0x%lx is in icache.", na.mft_no); /* @@ -1051,7 +1051,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, iput(vi); ntfs_debug("Base inode 0x%lx has no attached extent inodes, " "write the extent record.", na.mft_no); - return TRUE; + return true; } /* Iterate over the attached extent inodes. */ extent_nis = ni->ext.extent_ntfs_inos; @@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, ntfs_debug("Extent inode 0x%lx is not attached to its base " "inode 0x%lx, write the extent record.", mft_no, na.mft_no); - return TRUE; + return true; } ntfs_debug("Extent inode 0x%lx is attached to its base inode 0x%lx.", mft_no, na.mft_no); @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, iput(vi); ntfs_debug("Extent mft record 0x%lx is already locked, do " "not write it.", mft_no); - return FALSE; + return false; } ntfs_debug("Managed to lock extent mft record 0x%lx, write it.", mft_no); @@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, * the locked extent ntfs inode. */ *locked_ni = eni; - return TRUE; + return true; } static const char *es = " Leaving inconsistent metadata. Unmount and run " @@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@ static int ntfs_mft_bitmap_extend_allocation_nolock(ntfs_volume *vol) ntfs_unmap_page(page); /* Allocate a cluster from the DATA_ZONE. */ rl2 = ntfs_cluster_alloc(vol, rl[1].vcn, 1, lcn, DATA_ZONE, - TRUE); + true); if (IS_ERR(rl2)) { up_write(&mftbmp_ni->runlist.lock); ntfs_error(vol->sb, "Failed to allocate a cluster for " @@ -1724,7 +1724,7 @@ static int ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock(ntfs_volume *vol) ATTR_RECORD *a = NULL; int ret, mp_size; u32 old_alen = 0; - BOOL mp_rebuilt = FALSE; + bool mp_rebuilt = false; ntfs_debug("Extending mft data allocation."); mft_ni = NTFS_I(vol->mft_ino); @@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ static int ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock(ntfs_volume *vol) old_last_vcn = rl[1].vcn; do { rl2 = ntfs_cluster_alloc(vol, old_last_vcn, nr, lcn, MFT_ZONE, - TRUE); + true); if (likely(!IS_ERR(rl2))) break; if (PTR_ERR(rl2) != -ENOSPC || nr == min_nr) { @@ -1884,7 +1884,7 @@ static int ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock(ntfs_volume *vol) ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; goto undo_alloc; } - mp_rebuilt = TRUE; + mp_rebuilt = true; /* Generate the mapping pairs array directly into the attr record. */ ret = ntfs_mapping_pairs_build(vol, (u8*)a + le16_to_cpu(a->data.non_resident.mapping_pairs_offset), @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ ntfs_inode *ntfs_mft_record_alloc(ntfs_volume *vol, const int mode, unsigned int ofs; int err; le16 seq_no, usn; - BOOL record_formatted = FALSE; + bool record_formatted = false; if (base_ni) { ntfs_debug("Entering (allocating an extent mft record for " @@ -2454,7 +2454,7 @@ have_alloc_rec: mft_ni->initialized_size = new_initialized_size; } write_unlock_irqrestore(&mft_ni->size_lock, flags); - record_formatted = TRUE; + record_formatted = true; /* Update the mft data attribute record to reflect the new sizes. */ m = map_mft_record(mft_ni); if (IS_ERR(m)) { -- cgit v1.2.3