From 978b7237123d007b9fa983af6e0e2fa8f97f9934 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Chinner Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 16:29:46 +1000 Subject: [XFS] Fix fsync() b0rkage. xfs_fsync() fails to wait for data I/O completion before checking if the inode is dirty or clean to decide whether to log the inode or not. This misses inode size updates when the data flushed by the fsync() is extending the file. Hence, like fdatasync(), we need to wait for I/o completion first, then check the inode for cleanliness. Doing so makes the behaviour of xfs_fsync() identical for fsync and fdatasync and we *always* use synchronous semantics if the inode is dirty. Therefore also kill the differences and remove the unused flags from the xfs_fsync function and callers. SGI-PV: 981296 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31033a Signed-off-by: David Chinner Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy --- fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h') diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h index 8abe8f186e2..57335ba4ce5 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h @@ -18,8 +18,7 @@ int xfs_open(struct xfs_inode *ip); int xfs_setattr(struct xfs_inode *ip, struct bhv_vattr *vap, int flags, struct cred *credp); int xfs_readlink(struct xfs_inode *ip, char *link); -int xfs_fsync(struct xfs_inode *ip, int flag, xfs_off_t start, - xfs_off_t stop); +int xfs_fsync(struct xfs_inode *ip); int xfs_release(struct xfs_inode *ip); int xfs_inactive(struct xfs_inode *ip); int xfs_lookup(struct xfs_inode *dp, struct xfs_name *name, -- cgit v1.2.3