From cc1a9d86ce989083703c4bdc11b75a87e1cc404a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yinghai Lu Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:39:16 -0700 Subject: mm, x86: shrink_active_range() should check all Now we are using register_e820_active_regions() instead of add_active_range() directly. So end_pfn could be different between the value in early_node_map to node_end_pfn. So we need to make shrink_active_range() smarter. shrink_active_range() is a generic MM function in mm/page_alloc.c but it is only used on 32-bit x86. Should we move it back to some file in arch/x86? Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- include/linux/mm.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'include') diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index c31a9cd2a30..7cbd949f251 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -997,8 +997,7 @@ extern void free_area_init_node(int nid, pg_data_t *pgdat, extern void free_area_init_nodes(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn); extern void add_active_range(unsigned int nid, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn); -extern void shrink_active_range(unsigned int nid, unsigned long old_end_pfn, - unsigned long new_end_pfn); +extern void shrink_active_range(unsigned int nid, unsigned long new_end_pfn); extern void push_node_boundaries(unsigned int nid, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn); extern void remove_all_active_ranges(void); -- cgit v1.2.3