diff options
author | Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> | 2009-06-16 17:01:33 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-06-16 12:01:16 -0700 |
commit | 1aa4bed82a684308f54bf782cffaecd4b1dc3cf4 (patch) | |
tree | a629a5c25caf3880a23bda9af4404c86a8a5ad00 | |
parent | 762faaed91e4ea4a3c34bc58f3221d9487acb470 (diff) |
tty: fix sanity check
The WARN_ON() that was added to tty_reopen can be triggered in the specific
case of a hangup occurring during a re-open of a tty which is not in the
middle of being otherwise closed.
In that case however the WARN() is bogus as we don't hold the neccessary
locks to make a correct decision.
The case we should be checking is "if the ldisc is not changing and reopen
is occuring". We could drop the WARN_ON but for the moment the debug is more
valuable even if it means taking a mutex as it will find any other cases.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/char/tty_io.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_io.c b/drivers/char/tty_io.c index 939e198d767..a3afa0c387c 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tty_io.c +++ b/drivers/char/tty_io.c @@ -1263,7 +1263,9 @@ static int tty_reopen(struct tty_struct *tty) tty->count++; tty->driver = driver; /* N.B. why do this every time?? */ + mutex_lock(&tty->ldisc_mutex); WARN_ON(!test_bit(TTY_LDISC, &tty->flags)); + mutex_unlock(&tty->ldisc_mutex); return 0; } |