diff options
| author | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2009-11-04 11:54:15 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2009-11-04 11:59:45 +0100 |
| commit | a2e71271535fde493c32803b1f34789f97efcb5e (patch) | |
| tree | 90d7139bea2f49e947f27af92614fa6eca50b64d /drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c | |
| parent | 6d7aa9d721c8c640066142fd9534afcdf68d7f9d (diff) | |
| parent | b419148e567728f6af0c3b01965c1cc141e3e13a (diff) | |
Merge commit 'v2.6.32-rc6' into perf/core
Conflicts:
tools/perf/Makefile
Merge reason: Resolve the conflict, merge to upstream and merge in
perf fixes so we can add a dependent patch.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c b/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c index 4a110b7b267..6c4a4fc8363 100644 --- a/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c @@ -1463,7 +1463,9 @@ int pccard_read_tuple(struct pcmcia_socket *s, unsigned int function, cisdata_t return -ENOMEM; } tuple.DesiredTuple = code; - tuple.Attributes = TUPLE_RETURN_COMMON; + tuple.Attributes = 0; + if (function == BIND_FN_ALL) + tuple.Attributes = TUPLE_RETURN_COMMON; ret = pccard_get_first_tuple(s, function, &tuple); if (ret != 0) goto done; @@ -1490,7 +1492,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pccard_read_tuple); ======================================================================*/ -int pccard_validate_cis(struct pcmcia_socket *s, unsigned int function, unsigned int *info) +int pccard_validate_cis(struct pcmcia_socket *s, unsigned int *info) { tuple_t *tuple; cisparse_t *p; @@ -1515,30 +1517,30 @@ int pccard_validate_cis(struct pcmcia_socket *s, unsigned int function, unsigned count = reserved = 0; tuple->DesiredTuple = RETURN_FIRST_TUPLE; tuple->Attributes = TUPLE_RETURN_COMMON; - ret = pccard_get_first_tuple(s, function, tuple); + ret = pccard_get_first_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, tuple); if (ret != 0) goto done; /* First tuple should be DEVICE; we should really have either that or a CFTABLE_ENTRY of some sort */ if ((tuple->TupleCode == CISTPL_DEVICE) || - (pccard_read_tuple(s, function, CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY, p) == 0) || - (pccard_read_tuple(s, function, CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY_CB, p) == 0)) + (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY, p) == 0) || + (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY_CB, p) == 0)) dev_ok++; /* All cards should have a MANFID tuple, and/or a VERS_1 or VERS_2 tuple, for card identification. Certain old D-Link and Linksys cards have only a broken VERS_2 tuple; hence the bogus test. */ - if ((pccard_read_tuple(s, function, CISTPL_MANFID, p) == 0) || - (pccard_read_tuple(s, function, CISTPL_VERS_1, p) == 0) || - (pccard_read_tuple(s, function, CISTPL_VERS_2, p) != -ENOSPC)) + if ((pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_MANFID, p) == 0) || + (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_VERS_1, p) == 0) || + (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_VERS_2, p) != -ENOSPC)) ident_ok++; if (!dev_ok && !ident_ok) goto done; for (count = 1; count < MAX_TUPLES; count++) { - ret = pccard_get_next_tuple(s, function, tuple); + ret = pccard_get_next_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, tuple); if (ret != 0) break; if (((tuple->TupleCode > 0x23) && (tuple->TupleCode < 0x40)) || |