aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/nfs/file.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>2009-05-05 17:46:07 +0200
committerPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>2009-05-05 17:46:07 +0200
commit280f37afa2c270ff029cb420b34396aa002909c3 (patch)
tree6d90560f2210c7ddb4da5640a2d190357c4f41b4 /fs/nfs/file.c
parentb98b4947cb79d670fceca0e951c092eea93e9baa (diff)
netfilter: xt_cluster: fix use of cluster match with 32 nodes
This patch fixes a problem when you use 32 nodes in the cluster match: % iptables -I PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -m cluster \ --cluster-total-nodes 32 --cluster-local-node 32 \ --cluster-hash-seed 0xdeadbeef -j MARK --set-mark 0xffff iptables: Invalid argument. Run `dmesg' for more information. % dmesg | tail -1 xt_cluster: this node mask cannot be higher than the total number of nodes The problem is related to this checking: if (info->node_mask >= (1 << info->total_nodes)) { printk(KERN_ERR "xt_cluster: this node mask cannot be " "higher than the total number of nodes\n"); return false; } (1 << 32) is 1. Thus, the checking fails. BTW, I said this before but I insist: I have only tested the cluster match with 2 nodes getting ~45% extra performance in an active-active setup. The maximum limit of 32 nodes is still completely arbitrary. I'd really appreciate if people that have more nodes in their setups let me know. Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/nfs/file.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions