diff options
author | Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> | 2005-07-26 12:17:52 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> | 2005-07-26 14:35:45 -0700 |
commit | b35c67a46b025e8dc320b59fbe5c283094e1d7f5 (patch) | |
tree | dd22c5d664496ce9caab45825bb7f7ab1fe60545 /include/asm-ppc64 | |
parent | 6660316cb7a1a2c59a73a52870490c0f782f45c1 (diff) |
[PATCH] acpi: Don't call acpi_sleep_prepare from acpi_power_off
Now that all of the code paths that call acpi_power_off
have been modified to call either call kernel_power_off
(which calls apci_sleep_prepare by way of acpi_shutdown)
or to call acpi_sleep_prepare directly it is redundant to call
acpi_sleep_prepare from acpi_power_off.
So simplify the code and simply don't call acpi_sleep_prepare.
In addition there is a little error handling done so if we
can't register the acpi class we don't hook pm_power_off.
I think I have done the right thing with the CONFIG_PM define
but I'm not certain. Can this code even be compiled if
CONFIG_PM is false?
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/asm-ppc64')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions