diff options
author | Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> | 2006-05-20 15:00:09 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> | 2006-05-21 12:59:18 -0700 |
commit | bdd804f478a0cc74bf7db8e9f9d5fd379d1b31ca (patch) | |
tree | 2b8f083b1ca698c0f9321b3714dab036d2531f29 /mm | |
parent | 593ee20766921fec643194dff829e17f30552220 (diff) |
[PATCH] Cpuset: might sleep checking zones allowed fix
Fix a couple of infrequently encountered 'sleeping function called from
invalid context' in the cpuset hooks in __alloc_pages. Could sleep while
interrupts disabled.
The routine cpuset_zone_allowed() is called by code in mm/page_alloc.c
__alloc_pages() to determine if a zone is allowed in the current tasks
cpuset. This routine can sleep, for certain GFP_KERNEL allocations, if the
zone is on a memory node not allowed in the current cpuset, but might be
allowed in a parent cpuset.
But we can't sleep in __alloc_pages() if in interrupt, nor if called for a
GFP_ATOMIC request (__GFP_WAIT not set in gfp_flags).
The rule was intended to be:
Don't call cpuset_zone_allowed() if you can't sleep, unless you
pass in the __GFP_HARDWALL flag set in gfp_flag, which disables
the code that might scan up ancestor cpusets and sleep.
This rule was being violated in a couple of places, due to a bogus change
made (by myself, pj) to __alloc_pages() as part of the November 2005 effort
to cleanup its logic, and also due to a later fix to constrain which swap
daemons were awoken.
The bogus change can be seen at:
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2005-11/4691.html
[PATCH 01/05] mm fix __alloc_pages cpuset ALLOC_* flags
This was first noticed on a tight memory system, in code that was disabling
interrupts and doing allocation requests with __GFP_WAIT not set, which
resulted in __might_sleep() writing complaints to the log "Debug: sleeping
function called ...", when the code in cpuset_zone_allowed() tried to take
the callback_sem cpuset semaphore.
We haven't seen a system hang on this 'might_sleep' yet, but we are at
decent risk of seeing it fairly soon, especially since the additional
cpuset_zone_allowed() check was added, conditioning wakeup_kswapd(), in
March 2006.
Special thanks to Dave Chinner, for figuring this out, and a tip of the hat
to Nick Piggin who warned me of this back in Nov 2005, before I was ready
to listen.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/page_alloc.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 813b4ec1298..bb3416932ab 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ restart: goto got_pg; do { - if (cpuset_zone_allowed(*z, gfp_mask)) + if (cpuset_zone_allowed(*z, gfp_mask|__GFP_HARDWALL)) wakeup_kswapd(*z, order); } while (*(++z)); @@ -970,7 +970,8 @@ restart: alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER; if (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGH) alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HIGH; - alloc_flags |= ALLOC_CPUSET; + if (wait) + alloc_flags |= ALLOC_CPUSET; /* * Go through the zonelist again. Let __GFP_HIGH and allocations |